Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35586111›Full record

SynthesisComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Assessment and Evaluation of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Student Performance.

Yazan A Alsariera, Yahia Baashar, Gamal Alkawsi, Abdulsalam Mustafa, Ammar Ahmed Alkahtani, Nor'ashikin Ali

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yazan A AlsarieraDepartment of Computer Science, College of Science, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1359-6336
Yahia BaasharFaculty of Computing and Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Labuan, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8004-3929
Gamal AlkawsiFaculty of Computer Science and Information Systems, Thamar University, Yemen.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2456-4033
Abdulsalam MustafaCollege of Graduate Studies, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 43000, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3117-062X
Ammar Ahmed AlkahtaniInstitute of Sustainable Energy (ISE), Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 43000, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2067-9519
Nor'ashikin AliCollege of Graduate Studies, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 43000, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5653-2482

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Student performance is crucial to the success of tertiary institutions. Especially, academic achievement is one of the metrics used in rating top-quality universities. Despite the large volume of educational data, accurately predicting student performance becomes more challenging. The main reason for this is the limited research in various machine learning (ML) approaches. Accordingly, educators need to explore effective tools for modelling and assessing student performance while recognizing weaknesses to improve educational outcomes. The existing ML approaches and key features for predicting student performance were investigated in this work. Related studies published between 2015 and 2021 were identified through a systematic search of various online databases. Thirty-nine studies were selected and evaluated. The results showed that six ML models were mainly used: decision tree (DT), artificial neural networks (ANNs), support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), linear regression (LinR), and Naive Bayes (NB). Our results also indicated that ANN outperformed other models and had higher accuracy levels. Furthermore, academic, demographic, internal assessment, and family/personal attributes were the most predominant input variables (e.g., predictive features) used for predicting student performance. Our analysis revealed an increasing number of research in this domain and a broad range of ML algorithms applied. At the same time, the extant body of evidence suggested that ML can be beneficial in identifying and improving various academic performance areas.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessAlgorithmsMachine LearningBayes TheoremDecision TreesHumansLinear ModelsNeural Networks, ComputerStudentsSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID35586111
PMCPMC9110122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.