ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Prediction of Response to Radiotherapy by Characterizing the Transcriptomic Features in Clinical Tumor Samples across 15 Cancer Types.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the major cancer treatments. However, the responses to RT vary among individual patients, partly due to the differences of the status of gene expression and mutation in tumors of patients. Identification of patients who will benefit from RT will improve the efficacy of RT. However, only a few clinical biomarkers were currently used to predict RT response. Our aim is to obtain gene signatures that can be used to predict RT response by analyzing the transcriptome differences between RT responder and nonresponder groups. Materials and Methods: We obtained transcriptome data of 1664 patients treated with RT from the TCGA database across 15 cancer types. First, the genes with a significant difference between RT responder (R group) and nonresponder groups (PD group) were identified, and the top 100 genes were used to build the gene signatures. Then, we developed the predictive model based on binary logistic regression to predict patient response to RT. Results: We identified a series of differentially expressed genes between the two groups, which are involved in cell proliferation, migration, invasion, EMT, and DNA damage repair pathway. Among them, MDC1, UCP2, and RBM45 have been demonstrated to be involved in DNA damage repair and radiosensitivity. Our analysis revealed that the predictive model was highly specific for distinguishing the Conclusion: The predictive model has a potential clinical application as a biomarker to help physicians create optimal treatment plans. Furthermore, some of the genes identified here may be directly involved in radioresistance, providing clues for further studies on the mechanism of radioresistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.