ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Random Forest Algorithm Based on Speech for Early Identification of Parkinson's Disease.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative study of risk factors in predictive models for cognitive dysfunction in patients with leukoaraiosis based on machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Retracted: Random Forest Algorithm Based on Speech for Early Identification of Parkinson's Disease.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
- Deducing Leading Factors of Spatial Distribution of Carbon Reserves in Nanjing Metropolitan Area Based on Random Forest Model.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-26Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Human Subject Welfare · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/324043CF4BAF4A4BB7BC3644F2B190
- Retracted
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the effectiveness of identifying patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) from speech signals, various acoustic parameters including prosodic and segmental features are extracted from speech and then the random forest classification (RF) algorithm based on these acoustic parameters is applied to diagnose early-stage PD patients. To validate the proposed method of RF algorithm in early-stage PD identification, this study compares the accuracy rate of RF with that of neurologists' judgments based on auditory test outcomes, and the results clearly show the superiority of the proposed method over its rival. Random forest algorithm based on speech can improve the accuracy of patients' identification, which provides an efficient auxiliary method in the early diagnosis of PD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.