ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Cubital fossa defect- our reconstructive experience with pedicle flaps.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Myocutaneous latissimus dorsi split pedicle flap for simultaneous reconstruction of elbow and breast: a case report.International journal of burns and trauma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cubital fossa wounds can be complicated by the non-availability of reliable, well-vascularized donor tissue. Closure with pliable and readily available donor tissue for cubital defect and early mobilization of the elbow joint is essential for better results. The authors did this study to see how best the results of cubital fossa defect cover can be achieved by pedicle flaps in a single stage without compromising the donor areas. Material and method: Patients having deep elbow wounds in which vital structures were lying exposed in the cubital region were included in this study. The patients were assessed for the availability of tissue for cover, reliability of flaps, flap pliability, the functional outcome of the elbow and donor site morbidity. Results: A total of 17 cases of cubital region defects are presented wherein closure of the wound by means of primary closure was not possible. Out of these, eight were covered with Pedicled Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator (TDAP) flaps, five with Pedicled split Latissimus Dorsi Muscle (SLDM) flaps and four with reversed lateral arm flaps (RLA). Post-operatively all the flaps were healthy, patients attained a good range of elbow joint movements with no clinically evident morbidity of the donor site. Conclusion: Cubital fossa defect coverage needs dedicated planning to obtain
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.