Trial reportContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Application of a Remotely Controlled Artificial Intelligence Analgesic Pump Device in Painless Treatment of Children.
Trial report in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence-assisted interventions for perioperative anesthetic management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Pooled it
- Concordance of randomised controlled trials for artificial intelligence interventions with the CONSORT-AI reporting guidelines.Nature communications · 2024Pooled it
- Review
- Retracted: Application of a Remotely Controlled Artificial Intelligence Analgesic Pump Device in Painless Treatment of Children.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-09-27Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/B61CC43A8A124323B03638D50C00F4
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to effectively improve the application of analgesic pump devices in the treatment of children, a method based on remote control artificial intelligence is proposed. 100 children with dental pulpitis who were treated in a hospital from December 2018 to December 2020 were selected as the research subjects; they were randomly divided into control group and observation group by an equidistant sampling method, with 50 cases in each group. Children in the control group were given articaine and adrenaline anesthesia, and the observation group was treated with articaine and adrenaline combined with a computer-controlled anesthesia system, the anesthesia pain degree and satisfaction degree of the two groups of children were observed and compared. The results showed that the pain score in anesthesia and intraoperative pain score in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.