ArticleCancer management and research2022
Retrospective Review of Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in Advanced Leiomyosarcoma: A Real-World Study.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical efficacy and safety outcomes of anlotinib therapy in sarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Pooled it
- Exploiting collateral sensitivity in the evolution of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in soft tissue sarcomas.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome after anlotinib treatment for small cell lung cancer: A case report and literature review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Retrospective study on the safety and efficacy of anlotinib in the treatment of advanced leiomyosarcoma in real-world. Methods: Clinical data were collected from patients suffered from advanced leiomyosarcoma who received anlotinib treatment in Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences from January 2018 to December 2020. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were analyzed according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria. The progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse reactions were recorded and calculated. Results: A total of 19 patients (14 female, 5 male) were enrolled, 3 (15.8%) achieved partial response (PR), 11 (57.9%) achieved stable disease (SD), with an ORR of 15.8%, a DCR of 73.7%, a median PFS of 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.0~5.2) and a median OS of 23.5 months (95% CI: 14.2~32.7). The majority of adverse events were grade 1/2, the most common grade 3/4 adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (12.5%), hypertension (5.3%) and oral ulcer (5.3%). Conclusion: Our results forecast that anlotinib is effective, safe and alternative in treatment of advanced leiomyosarcoma in real-world, combined with immunotherapy may become a potential treatment option. Further, more prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.