ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Estimation of Human Cerebral Atrophy Based on Systemic Metabolic Status Using Machine Learning.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Estimation of cognitive impairment in chronic pain patients and characteristics of estimated mild cognitive impairment.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Relationship Between Dementia and Systemic Metabolic Disorders.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Prevalence and risk factors of brain atrophy and associated confusion state among adults from three hospitals in northern Tanzania.The Pan African medical journal · 2023Article
- Machine-Learning Algorithm for Predicting Fatty Liver Disease in a Taiwanese Population.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Based on the assumption that systemic metabolic disorders affect cognitive function, we have developed a deep neural network (DNN) model that can estimate cognitive function based on basic blood test data that do not contain dementia-specific biomarkers. In this study, we used the same DNN model to assess whether basic blood data can be used to estimate cerebral atrophy. Methods: We used data from 1,310 subjects (58.32 ± 12.91years old) enrolled in the Brain Doc Bank. The average Mini Mental State Examination score was 28.6 ± 1.9. The degree of cerebral atrophy was determined using the MRI-based index (GM-BHQ). First, we evaluated the correlations between the subjects' age, blood data, and GM-BHQ. Next, we developed DNN models to assess the GM-BHQ: one used subjects' age and blood data, while the other used only blood data for input items. Results: There was a negative correlation between age and GM-BHQ scores (r = -0.71). The subjects' age was positively correlated with blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (r = 0.40), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (r = 0.22), glucose (GLU) (r = 0.22), and negative correlations with red blood cell counts (RBC) (r = -0.29) and platelet counts (PLT) (r = -0.26). GM-BHQ correlated with BUN (r = -0.30), GLU (r = -0.26), PLT (r = 0.26), and ALP (r = 0.22). The GM-BHQ estimated by the DNN model with subject age exhibited a positive correlation with the ground truth GM-BHQ (r = 0.70). Furthermore, even if the DNN model without subject age was used, the estimated GM-BHQ showed a significant positive correlation with ground truth GM-BHQ (r = 0.58). Age was the most important variable for estimating GM-BHQ. Discussion: Aging had the greatest effect on cerebral atrophy. Aging also affects various organs, such as the kidney, and causes changes in systemic metabolic status, which may contribute to cerebral atrophy and cognitive impairment. The DNN model may serve as a new screening test for dementia using basic blood tests for health examinations. Finally, the blood data reflect systemic metabolic disorders in each subject-this method may thus contribute to personalized care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.