Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35585665›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2022

Complete Sequences of the Velvet Worm Slime Proteins Reveal that Slime Formation is Enabled by Disulfide Bonds and Intrinsically Disordered Regions.

Yang Lu, Bhargy Sharma, Wei Long Soon, Xiangyan Shi, Tianyun Zhao, Yan Ting Lim, Radoslaw M Sobota, Shawn Hoon, Giovanni Pilloni, Adam Usadi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Coacervates as bio-inspired intermediates for materials processing.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Conserved leucine-rich repeat proteins in the adhesive projectile slime of velvet worms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yang LuCentre for Sustainable Materials (SusMat), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
Bhargy SharmaCentre for Sustainable Materials (SusMat), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
Wei Long SoonCentre for Sustainable Materials (SusMat), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
Xiangyan ShiDepartment of Biology, Shenzhen MSU-BIT University, No. 1 International University Park Road, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, 518172, P. R. China.
Tianyun ZhaoFunctional Proteomics Laboratory, Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*Star), Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Singapore.
Yan Ting LimFunctional Proteomics Laboratory, Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*Star), Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Singapore.
Radoslaw M SobotaFunctional Proteomics Laboratory, Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*Star), Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Singapore.
Shawn HoonMolecular Engineering Lab, IMCB, A*Star, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Singapore.
Giovanni PilloniExxonMobil Research and Engineering, New Jersey, 08801, USA.
Adam UsadiExxonMobil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd, Singapore, 098633, Singapore.
Konstantin PervushinSchool of Biological Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 637551, Singapore.
Ali MiserezCentre for Sustainable Materials (SusMat), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, 639798, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0864-8170

Funding

Academic Research Fund 2019-T3-1-012ExxonMobil through the Singapore Energy Research Center (SgEC)Singapore Ministry of EducationSingapore National Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The slime of velvet worms (Onychophora) is a strong and fully biodegradable protein material, which upon ejection undergoes a fast liquid-to-solid transition to ensnare prey. However, the molecular mechanisms of slime self-assembly are still not well understood, notably because the primary structures of slime proteins are yet unknown. Combining transcriptomic and proteomic studies, the authors have obtained the complete primary sequences of slime proteins and identified key features for slime self-assembly. The high molecular weight slime proteins contain cysteine residues at the N- and C-termini that mediate the formation of multi-protein complexes via disulfide bonding. Low complexity domains in the N-termini are also identified and their propensity for liquid-liquid phase separation is established, which may play a central role in slime biofabrication. Using solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance, rigid and flexible domains of the slime proteins are mapped to specific peptide domains. The complete sequencing of major slime proteins is an important step toward sustainable fabrication of polymers inspired by the velvet worm slime.

Indexed as

Helminth ProteinsProteomicsDisulfidesProtein DomainsProteinsDisulfidesHelminth ProteinsProteinsfibersnuclear magnetic resonanceprotein sequenceproteomicsslimestructurevelvet worms

Identifiers

PMID35585665
PMCPMC9218773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.