Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35585585›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

"One-time interventions, it doesn't lead to much" - healthcare provider views to improving sexual and reproductive health services for young migrants in Sweden.

Veronika Tirado, Siri Engberg, Ingrid Siösteen Holmblad, Susanne Strömdahl, Anna Mia Ekström, Anna Karin Hurtig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Crossing Borders: SRH Challenges Among Immigrant and Minority Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Veronika TiradoDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Veronika.Tirado@ki.se.
Siri EngbergDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ingrid Siösteen HolmbladDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Susanne StrömdahlDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna Mia EkströmDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna Karin HurtigDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEUmeå University · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd 2017-01111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) is an important aspect for young people. In Sweden, young migrants often encounter barriers to accessing and using sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, despite that these services are free of charge for young people (ages 15-25). Healthcare providers' views and best practices are of great importance for improving the utilisation of existing SRH services, particularly for young people. This study aims to understand healthcare providers' experiences and perspectives on barriers to SRHR among young migrants and their suggestions for strategies to improve the provision of SRH services to this group.

methodsMidwives, counsellors and nurses with at least five years of professional experience within SRHR were reached through a purposeful sample at primary care clinics, specialised clinics and youth-friendly clinics, which provide SRH services to migrant youths in Stockholm. Twelve interviews were conducted from May 2018 to February 2020. Qualitative content analysis was performed.

resultsThe analysis identified one theme: Improving the fragmentation in the SRH services, and four sub-themes: 1. Being unaware of SRHR; 2. Creating trust and responsive interactions; 3. Communicating in the same language; and 4. Collaborating to build bridges. The barriers included distrust in the healthcare system, socio-cultural norms surrounding SRHR, incomplete translations, and a need for long-lasting collaboration with SRH services and other range of services for migrants. The strategies for improvement as suggested by participants included involving existing cultural groups and organisations to enable trust, consistent and dependable interpreters, a streamline of SRH services with other healthcare staff and health facilities, and collaborations with homes designated for young migrants and language schools for a direct linkage to service providers.

conclusionsFindings indicate that there are fragmentations in SRH services, and these include lack of knowledge about SRHR among migrant youth, language and communication barriers, and a lack of structure needed to build dependable services that go beyond one-time interventions. While initiatives and strategies from healthcare providers for improvement of SRH services exist, the implementation of some strategies may also require involving the regional and national decision-makers and multi-stakeholders like communities, civil society and young migrants themselves.

Indexed as

Reproductive Health ServicesTransients and MigrantsAdolescentAdultHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHumansReproductive HealthSexual BehaviorSwedenYoung AdultAccess to healthcareHealthcare providersHealth workforceHIVMigrantsSexual and reproductive health and rightsSwedenYouth

Identifiers

PMID35585585
PMCPMC9115984
OpenAlexW4280529514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.