Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35585546›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2022

A protocol for Chenopodium quinoa pollen germination.

S Elizabeth Castillo, Jose C Tovar, Anastasia Shamin, Jorge Gutirerrez, Paige Pearson, Malia A Gehan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S Elizabeth CastilloDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, 63132, USA.
Jose C TovarDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, 63132, USA.
Anastasia ShaminDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, 63132, USA.
Jorge GutirerrezDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, 63132, USA.
Paige PearsonDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, 63132, USA.
Malia A GehanDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, 63132, USA. mgehan@danforthcenter.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3238-2627
Donald Danforth Plant Science Center · US

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2019-67021-29926National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2020-67012-31897National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2022-67021-36467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuinoa is an increasingly popular seed crop frequently studied for its tolerance to various abiotic stresses as well as its susceptibility to heat. Estimations of quinoa pollen viability through staining methods have resulted in conflicting results. A more effective alternative to stains is to estimate pollen viability through in vitro germination. Here we report a method for in vitro quinoa pollen germination that could be used to understand the impact of various stresses on quinoa fertility and therefore seed yield or to identify male-sterile lines for breeding.

resultsA semi-automated method to count germinating pollen was developed in PlantCV, which can be widely used by the community. Pollen collected on day 4 after first anthesis at zeitgeber time 5 was optimum for pollen germination with an average germination of 68% for accession QQ74 (PI 614886). The optimal length of pollen incubation was found to be 48 h, because it maximizes germination rates while minimizing contamination. The pollen germination medium's pH, boric acid, and sucrose concentrations were optimized. The highest germination rates were obtained with 16% sucrose, 0.03% boric acid, 0.007% calcium nitrate, and pH 5.5. This medium was tested on quinoa accessions QQ74, and cherry vanilla with 68%, and 64% germination efficiencies, respectively.

conclusionsWe provide an in vitro pollen germination method for quinoa with average germination rates of 64 and 68% on the two accessions tested. This method is a valuable tool to estimate pollen viability in quinoa, and to test how stress affects quinoa fertility. We also developed an image analysis tool to semi-automate the process of counting germinating pollen. Quinoa produces many new flowers during most of its panicle development period, leading to significant variation in pollen maturity and viability between different flowers of the same panicle. Therefore, collecting pollen at 4 days after first anthesis is very important to collect more uniformly developed pollen and to obtain high germination rates.

Indexed as

Pollen germinationProtocolQuinoa

Identifiers

PMID35585546
PMCPMC9118578
OpenAlexW4280519322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.