Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35585520›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Perceptions of patient aggression in psychiatric hospitals: a qualitative study using focus groups with nurses, patients, and informal caregivers.

Maritta Välimäki, Tella Lantta, Yuen Ting Joyce Lam, Teris Cheung, Po Yee Ivy Cheng, Tony Ng, Glendy Ip, Daniel Bressington

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Maritta VälimäkiXiangya School of Nursing, Xiangya Center for Evidence-Based Practice & Healthcare Innovation, Central South University, 172 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China. maritta.vaelimaeki@csu.edu.cn.
Tella LanttaDepartment of Nursing Science, ICT-city, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Yuen Ting Joyce LamSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong (SAR), China.
Teris CheungSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong (SAR), China.
Po Yee Ivy ChengCommunity Psychiatric Services, 12/F, Block A, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong (SAR), China.
Tony NgDepartment of Psychiatry, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong (SAR), China.
Glendy IpCentral Nursing Division, Kwai Chung Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong (SAR), China.
Daniel BressingtonCollege of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Casuarine, Darwin, NT, 0909, Australia.
Hospital Authority · CNHong Kong Polytechnic University · HKCentral South University · CNCharles Darwin University · AUUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAggression in psychiatric hospitals has been of interest to researchers. Information on how different stakeholders perceive patient aggression remains equivocal. Even less is known about possible similarities or differences in stakeholders' perceptions of how aggressive behaviour is understood, managed and prevented in psychiatric hospitals. We aimed to explore multiple viewpoints on patient aggression, its possible causes and outcomes, and development ideas for prevention and management.

methodsA qualitative design was adopted. The data were collected using focus group interviews. A thematic approach was used for interpretation. The data were collected on 15 adult wards in two inpatient psychiatric settings in Hong Kong. Participants were nurses working on the psychiatric inpatient wards, patients admitted to the wards, and informal caregivers visiting inpatient wards (N = 94).

resultsCommonalities between all groups were found on how patient aggression is perceived, and why it occurs. Patients and especially nurses described how patient aggression occurred with no clear reason or forewarning and how patients were physically controlled or restricted after aggressive events. Only nurses and patients expressed experiencing physical burden, while all groups considered psychological burden to be a consequence of aggression. All groups proposed that helpful attitudes among nurses, better communication, structural changes, and better self-management skills would prevent patient aggression. Risk assessment was proposed only by nurses and patients, while safety measures were proposed by nurses and informal caregivers only. The use of restrictive interventions to manage aggressive events was proposed by all groups.

conclusionsDespite the complex diversity of perspectives in different stakeholder groups regarding patient aggression, the findings highlighted that it is possible to achieve some mutual understanding of aggression in psychiatric hospitals and identify areas to be developed. Staffs' attitudes and skills for engagement and communication with patients and informal caregivers should be improved. There is also still room to develop the therapeutic environment and culture toward meaningful activities during the treatment period.

Indexed as

CaregiversHospitals, PsychiatricAdultAggressionAttitude of Health PersonnelFocus GroupsHumansInpatientsFocus groupHospitalInformal caregiverNursePatientPatient aggressionPsychiatricQualitativeViolence

Identifiers

PMID35585520
PMCPMC9118596
OpenAlexW4280526660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.