Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35585494›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2022

PhyloMissForest: a random forest framework to construct phylogenetic trees with missing data.

Diogo Pinheiro, Sergio Santander-Jimenéz, Aleksandar Ilic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Opportunities and Challenges in Applying AI to Evolutionary Morphology.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diogo PinheiroINESC-ID, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Alves Redol 9, Lisboa, 1000-029, Portugal.
Sergio Santander-JimenézDepartment of Computer and Communications Technologies, University of Extremadura, Campus universitario s/n, Cáceres, 10003, Spain.
Aleksandar IlicINESC-ID, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Alves Redol 9, Lisboa, 1000-029, Portugal. aleksandar.ilic@inesc-id.pt.

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigaci?n PID2019-07299GB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033European Commission 956213Funda??o para a Ci?ncia e a Tecnologia UIDB/50021/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the pursuit of a better understanding of biodiversity, evolutionary biologists rely on the study of phylogenetic relationships to illustrate the course of evolution. The relationships among natural organisms, depicted in the shape of phylogenetic trees, not only help to understand evolutionary history but also have a wide range of additional applications in science. One of the most challenging problems that arise when building phylogenetic trees is the presence of missing biological data. More specifically, the possibility of inferring wrong phylogenetic trees increases proportionally to the amount of missing values in the input data. Although there are methods proposed to deal with this issue, their applicability and accuracy is often restricted by different constraints.

resultsWe propose a framework, called PhyloMissForest, to impute missing entries in phylogenetic distance matrices and infer accurate evolutionary relationships. PhyloMissForest is built upon a random forest structure that infers the missing entries of the input data, based on the known parts of it. PhyloMissForest contributes with a robust and configurable framework that incorporates multiple search strategies and machine learning, complemented by phylogenetic techniques, to provide a more accurate inference of lost phylogenetic distances. We evaluate our framework by examining three real-world datasets, two DNA-based sequence alignments and one containing amino acid data, and two additional instances with simulated DNA data. Moreover, we follow a design of experiments methodology to define the hyperparameter values of our algorithm, which is a concise method, preferable in comparison to the well-known exhaustive parameters search. By varying the percentages of missing data from 5% to 60%, we generally outperform the state-of-the-art alternative imputation techniques in the tests conducted on real DNA data. In addition, significant improvements in execution time are observed for the amino acid instance. The results observed on simulated data also denote the attainment of improved imputations when dealing with large percentages of missing data.

conclusionsBy merging multiple search strategies, machine learning, and phylogenetic techniques, PhyloMissForest provides a highly customizable and robust framework for phylogenetic missing data imputation, with significant topological accuracy and effective speedups over the state of the art.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDNAAmino AcidsPhylogenySequence AlignmentAmino AcidsDNAMachine learningMissing data imputationPhylogenetic treeRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID35585494
PMCPMC9116704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.