Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35585468›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2022

Mini-craniotomy for intra-axial brain tumors: a comparison with conventional craniotomy in 306 patients harboring non-dural based lesions.

Sergio Paolini, Rocco Severino, Cristina Mancarella, Giovanni Cardarelli, Marco Ciavarro, Augusto Di Castelnuovo, Licia Iacoviello, Giuseppe Minniti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sergio PaoliniDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Neuromed, Via Atinense 18 86077, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
Rocco SeverinoDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Neuromed, Via Atinense 18 86077, Pozzilli, IS, Italy. severinorocco@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7319-6724
Cristina MancarellaDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Neuromed, Via Atinense 18 86077, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
Giovanni CardarelliDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Neuromed, Via Atinense 18 86077, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
Marco CiavarroDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Neuromed, Via Atinense 18 86077, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
Augusto Di CastelnuovoMediterranea Cardiocentro, Naples, Italy.
Licia IacovielloDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
Giuseppe MinnitiRadiation Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of a mini-craniotomy approach involving linear skin incision and a bone flap of about 3 cm has been reported for several neurosurgical diseases, such as aneurysms or cranial base tumors. More superficial lesions, including intra-axial tumors, may occasionally raise concerns due to insufficient control of the tumor boundaries. The convenience of a minimally invasive approach to intrinsic brain tumors was evaluated by comparing 161 patients who underwent mini-craniotomy (MC) for intra-axial brain tumors with a group of 145 patients operated on by the same surgical team through a conventional craniotomy (CC). Groups were propensity-matched for age, preoperative condition, size and location of the tumor, and pathological diagnosis. Results were analyzed focusing on operative time, the extent of resection, clinical outcome, hospitalization time, and time to start adjuvant therapy. Mini-craniotomy was equally effective in terms of extent of resection (GTR: 70.9% in the MC group vs 70.5% in the CC group) but had shorter operative time (average: 165 min in the MC group vs 205 min in the CC group p < 0.001) and lower rate of postoperative complications both superficial (1.03% vs 6.5% in the CC group p = 0.009) and deep (4% in the MC group vs 5.5% in the CC group p = 0,47). No relationship was found between the size or location of the tumor and resection rate. The MC group had reduced hospitalization time (average: 5.8 days vs 7.6 in CC group p < 0.001) and faster access to adjuvant therapies. 92.5% of the MC patients, which were scheduled for treatment, started radiotherapy within 8 weeks after surgery as opposed to 84.1% in the CC group (p = 0.04). These findings support the increasing use of mini-craniotomy for intra-axial brain tumors.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsSkull Base NeoplasmsCraniotomyHumansOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBrain tumorCraniotomyGliomaKeyholeMetastasisMinimally invasive

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.