Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35585427›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2022

Reproxalap Activity and Estimation of Clinically Relevant Thresholds for Ocular Itching and Redness in a Randomized Allergic Conjunctivitis Field Trial.

Bill Cavanagh, Paul J Gomes, Christopher E Starr, Kelly K Nichols, Todd C Brady

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03660878 (A Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Vehicle-Controlled, Methodology Development Environmental Clinical Trial With Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solutions), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03660878 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Vehicle-Controlled, Methodology Development Environmental Clinical Trial With Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solutions (0.25% and 0.5%) in Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorAldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.Ran2018 to 2019Enrolled52ConditionsAllergic ConjunctivitisArmsReproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%), Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%), Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bill CavanaghAldeyra Therapeutics, Inc, 131 Hartwell Avenue, Suite 320, Lexington, MA, 02421, USA.
Paul J GomesOra, Inc, Andover, MA, USA.
Christopher E StarrWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Kelly K NicholsUniversity of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Todd C BradyAldeyra Therapeutics, Inc, 131 Hartwell Avenue, Suite 320, Lexington, MA, 02421, USA. tbrady@aldeyra.com.
Andover Eye Associates · USCornell University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Aldeyra Therapeutics No award number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis clinical trial assessed the activity of reproxalap, a novel reactive aldehyde species modulator, and estimated clinically relevant thresholds for changes in ocular itching and redness in an allergic conjunctivitis field trial.

methodsThis was a randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled phase 2 trial. Patients with ragweed-associated allergic conjunctivitis were assessed over 28 days in an environmental setting with approximately four doses per day of either 0.25% reproxalap, 0.5% reproxalap, or vehicle. Patients recorded ocular itching, redness, tearing, and eyelid swelling scores (each with a 0-4 scale, except for a 0-3 scale for swelling), and completed the Allergic Conjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire at the beginning and end of the trial.

resultsMixed model of repeated measures analysis demonstrated statistically lower itching and tearing scores (pooled P = 0.026 and P < 0.001, respectively) and numerically lower redness and eyelid swelling scores than vehicle on days when pollen exceeded the 95th percentile value. Using three anchor-based and three distribution-based approaches, the meaningful within-patient change and the between-group meaningful difference for patient-reported ocular itching and redness was estimated to be approximately 0.5. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event associated with reproxalap was transient irritation upon instillation.

conclusionIn a field clinical trial, reproxalap was well tolerated and superior to vehicle in reducing ocular itching on high-pollen days. The clinical meaningfulness threshold estimates of 0.5 units are among the first such calculations generated for the standard ocular itching and redness scores, providing important context for the clinical interpretation of clinical trials in allergic conjunctivitis.

Indexed as

Allergic conjunctivitisClinical relevanceClinical trialOcular itchingOcular rednessRASP modulatorReproxalap

Identifiers

PMID35585427
PMCPMC9253207
OpenAlexW4280604292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.