Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35585222›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Altered performance monitoring in Tourette Syndrome: an MEG investigation.

Jacqueline Metzlaff, Jennifer Finis, Alexander Münchau, Kirsten Müller-Vahl, Alfons Schnitzler, Christian Bellebaum, Katja Biermann-Ruben, Valentina Niccolai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jacqueline MetzlaffInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany. jacqueline.haserodt@hhu.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9443-148X
Jennifer FinisInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Alexander MünchauInstitute of Systems Motor Science, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
Kirsten Müller-VahlClinic of Psychiatry, Socialpsychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Alfons SchnitzlerInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Christian BellebaumDepartment of Biological Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Katja Biermann-RubenInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Valentina NiccolaiInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The error-related negativity (ERN) is an event-related potential component indexing processes of performance monitoring during simple stimulus-response tasks: the ERN is typically enhanced for error processing and conflicting response representations. Investigations in healthy participants and different patient groups have linked the ERN to the dopamine system and to prefrontal information processing. As in patients with Tourette Syndrome (TS) both dopamine release and prefrontal information processing are impaired, we hypothesized that performance monitoring would be altered, which was investigated with magnetencephalography (MEG). We examined performance monitoring in TS patients by assessing the magnetic equivalent of the ERN (mERN). The mERN was investigated in tic-free trials of eight adult, unmedicated TS patients without clinically significant comorbidity and ten matched healthy controls while performing a Go/NoGo task in selected frontocentral channels. The analysis of the response-related amplitudes of the event-related magnetic field showed that TS patients, in contrast to controls, did not show earlier amplitude modulation (between 70 and 105 ms after response onset) depending on response type (errors or correct responses). In both groups significant mERN amplitudes in the time-window between 105 and 160 ms after response onset were detected thus pointing at only later error processing in TS patients. In TS patients, early error-related processing might be affected by an enhanced motor control triggered by a conflict between the targeted high task performance and tic suppression. TS patients seem to tend to initially process all responses as erroneous responses.

Indexed as

Tourette SyndromeAdultDopamineElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsHumansPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeDopamine

Identifiers

PMID35585222
PMCPMC9117680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.