Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35585205›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Improved simultaneous LET and dose measurements in proton therapy.

Jeppe Brage Christensen, Michele Togno, Lily Bossin, Oskari Ville Pakari, Sairos Safai, Eduardo Gardenali Yukihara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. High-Resolution MgBMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Addressing Current Challenges in OSL Dosimetry Using MgBMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Characterisation and Quenching Correction for an AlSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeppe Brage ChristensenDepartment of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland. jeppe.christensen@psi.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-6894-381X
Michele TognoCenter for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6840-814X
Lily BossinDepartment of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7355-1220
Oskari Ville PakariDepartment of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3704-8190
Sairos SafaiCenter for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
Eduardo Gardenali YukiharaDepartment of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4615-6698
Paul Scherrer Institute · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 206021_177028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to improve the precision of linear energy transfer (LET) measurements using [Formula: see text] optically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLDs) in proton beams, and, with that, improve OSL dosimetry by correcting the readout for the LET-dependent ionization quenching. The OSLDs were irradiated in spot-scanning proton beams at different doses for fluence-averaged LET values in the (0.4-6.5) [Formula: see text] range (in water). A commercial automated OSL reader with a built-in beta source was used for the readouts, which enabled a reference irradiation and readout of each OSLD to establish individual corrections. Pulsed OSL was used to separately measure the blue (F-center) and UV ([Formula: see text]-center) emission bands of [Formula: see text] and the ratio between them (UV/blue signal) was used for the LET measurements. The average deviation between the simulated and measured LET values along the central beam axis amounts to 5.5% if both the dose and LET are varied, but the average deviation is reduced to 3.5% if the OSLDs are irradiated with the same doses. With the measurement procedure and automated equipment used here, the variation in the signals used for LET estimates and quenching-corrections is reduced from 0.9 to 0.6%. The quenching-corrected OSLD doses are in agreement with ionization chamber measurements within the uncertainties. The automated OSLD corrections are demonstrated to improve the LET estimates and the ionization quenching-corrections in proton dosimetry for a clinically relevant energy range up to 230 MeV. It is also for the first time demonstrated how the LET can be estimated for different doses.

Indexed as

Linear Energy TransferProton TherapyLuminescenceProtonsRadiometryProtons

Identifiers

PMID35585205
PMCPMC9117334
OpenAlexW4280488248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.