GuidelineNature medicine2022
Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI.
Guideline in Nature medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 457 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
457 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Objective technical skills assessment in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of manual, kinematic, and AI-based tools.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy of AI in Prediction and Assessment of Compromised Free Flaps: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness, Safety, and Workflow Burden of Large Language Model-Based Medical Report Generation: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Applications of artificial intelligence in robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- AI-aided diagnostic performance for prostate MRI: systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Explainable artificial intelligence in medical ultrasound: a WoSCC-based bibliometric analysis, evidence map, and Scopus concordance assessment.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- AI-based clinician decision support system for diagnosis of inherited retinal diseases: a multicenter, randomized trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- A randomized controlled trial of artificial intelligence-based analytics for clinical deterioration.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Beyond the algorithm: why oncology nursing in Asia-Pacific needs evidence-based AI evaluation.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Dose-conditioned machine-learning prediction of a composite target sedation state in patients undergoing propofol-sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy.Annals of medicine · 2026Observational
- Artificial Intelligence Readiness in Emergency Medicine: Expert Consensus Opinion for Preparing the Workforce.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- Clinician-accessible automated machine learning in oral healthcare: A systematic review.The Japanese dental science review · 2026Review
- Machine Learning in Causal Effect Estimation and Causal Evaluation of ML-Enabled Interventions in Nursing-Related Research: A Scoping Review.Nursing & health sciences · 2026Article
- Same-Patient, Same-Time Point Evidence for Radiomics Benchmarking.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Authors' Reply: Clarifying the Comparative Interpretation and Clinical Implications of Radiomics-Based AI for Pathological Response Prediction.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Orthopaedics at crossroads: are we ready for the responsible use of artificial intelligence in research?International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- AI-Based Measurement Tools for Intrinsic Capacity in Older Adults: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Concise stakeholder-informed tool for reporting modifications to innovative surgical procedures and devices: Surgical ModificAtion Reporting Tool (SMART) checklist.The British journal of surgery · 2026Article
- From lesion-level non-inferiority to screening-level substitution.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- The missing links in agentic AI autonomy.Nature medicine · 2026Article
397 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A growing number of artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support systems are showing promising performance in preclinical, in silico evaluation, but few have yet demonstrated real benefit to patient care. Early-stage clinical evaluation is important to assess an AI system's actual clinical performance at small scale, ensure its safety, evaluate the human factors surrounding its use and pave the way to further large-scale trials. However, the reporting of these early studies remains inadequate. The present statement provides a multi-stakeholder, consensus-based reporting guideline for the Developmental and Exploratory Clinical Investigations of DEcision support systems driven by Artificial Intelligence (DECIDE-AI). We conducted a two-round, modified Delphi process to collect and analyze expert opinion on the reporting of early clinical evaluation of AI systems. Experts were recruited from 20 pre-defined stakeholder categories. The final composition and wording of the guideline was determined at a virtual consensus meeting. The checklist and the Explanation & Elaboration (E&E) sections were refined based on feedback from a qualitative evaluation process. In total, 123 experts participated in the first round of Delphi, 138 in the second round, 16 in the consensus meeting and 16 in the qualitative evaluation. The DECIDE-AI reporting guideline comprises 17 AI-specific reporting items (made of 28 subitems) and ten generic reporting items, with an E&E paragraph provided for each. Through consultation and consensus with a range of stakeholders, we developed a guideline comprising key items that should be reported in early-stage clinical studies of AI-based decision support systems in healthcare. By providing an actionable checklist of minimal reporting items, the DECIDE-AI guideline will facilitate the appraisal of these studies and replicability of their findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35585198What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.