ArticleHNO2022
[The "difficult" patient-Vestibular testing under difficult conditions : Part 1: History taking and clinical neurotological examination].
Article in HNO, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients presenting with vertigo or dizziness may pose a real challenge for the clinical otorhinolaryngologist. This series of articles covers different aspects of the "difficult" dizzy patient. The first part is dedicated to pearls and pitfalls in history taking and clinical neurotological examination. It suggests possible solutions for challenging situations in history taking, such as definition of the expectations and aims, patients presenting with a long-winded history, patients' description of the symptom "vertigo", multiple vestibular syndromes in one patient, discrepancy between subjective symptoms and objective vestibular findings, cognitive bias and dealing with emotions. Furthermore, it offers practically oriented tips for the neurotological examination of patients with problems of the cervical spine, oculomotor disorders and anxiety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.