Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35584869›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Landscaping the evidence of intimate partner violence and postpartum depression: a systematic review.

Lea Bo Sønderlund Ankerstjerne, Sweetness Naftal Laizer, Karen Andreasen, Anne Katrine Normann, Chunsen Wu, Ditte Søndergaard Linde, Vibeke Rasch

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Lea Bo Sønderlund AnkerstjerneDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark lea.ankerstjerne@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-0704-4482
Sweetness Naftal LaizerKilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania.
Karen AndreasenGynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense Universitetshospital, Odense, Denmark.
Anne Katrine NormannDeparment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1587-3616
Chunsen WuDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Ditte Søndergaard LindeInstitute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0851-6760
Vibeke RaschInstitute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKOdense University Hospital · DKClinical Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the evidence of the association between exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) and postpartum depression. IPV during pregnancy can have immediate and long-term physical and mental health consequences for the family. Therefore, it has been hypothesised that IPV may affect the risk of developing postpartum depression.

methodsA systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Global Health Library, Scopus and Google scholar were searched for published studies without restrictions on language, time or study design (up to May 2020). Studies were included if they assessed postpartum depression using the Edinburg Postnatal Depression Scale (cut-off≥10), among women who had been exposed to IPV (emotional, physical and/or sexual abuse). The quality of studies was judged according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

resultsA total of 33 studies were included in the review (participants n=131 131). The majority of studies found an association between exposure to IPV and the development of signs of postpartum depression. Overall, studies measured both exposure and outcome in various ways and controlled for a vast number of different confounders. Thirty percent of the studies were set in low-income and lower-middle-income countries while the rest were set in upper-middle-income and high-income countries and the association did not differ across settings. Among the studies reporting adjusted OR (aOR) (n=26), the significant aOR ranged between 1.18 and 6.87 (95% CI 1.12 to 11.78). The majority of the studies were judged as 'good quality' (n=20/33).

conclusionWe found evidence of an association between exposure to IPV and the development of signs of postpartum depression. Meta-analysis or individual patient data meta-analysis is required to quantify the magnitude of the association between IPV and postpartum depression. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020209435.

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumIntimate Partner ViolenceDepressionEmotionsFemaleHumansMental HealthPovertyPregnancyRisk FactorsDepression & mood disordersMaternal medicineMENTAL HEALTHReproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID35584869
PMCPMC9119188
OpenAlexW4280525953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.