Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35584867›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Importance of sex and gender factors for COVID-19 infection and hospitalisation: a sex-stratified analysis using machine learning in UK Biobank data.

Zahra Azizi, Yumika Shiba, Pouria Alipour, Farhad Maleki, Valeria Raparelli, Colleen Norris, Reza Forghani, Louise Pilote, Khaled El Emam, GOING-FWD investigators and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zahra AziziCentre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Yumika ShibaDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Pouria AlipourCentre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Farhad MalekiAugmented Intelligence & Precision Health Laboratory (AIPHL), Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Valeria RaparelliDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Colleen NorrisFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Reza ForghaniAugmented Intelligence & Precision Health Laboratory (AIPHL), Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Louise PiloteCentre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada louise.pilote@mcgill.ca kelemam@ehealthinformation.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6159-0628
Khaled El EmamElectronic Health Information Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada louise.pilote@mcgill.ca kelemam@ehealthinformation.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-3325-4149
GOING-FWD investigators
GOING FWD Investigators

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine sex and gender roles in COVID-19 test positivity and hospitalisation in sex-stratified predictive models using machine learning.

designCross-sectional study.

settingUK Biobank prospective cohort.

participantsParticipants tested between 16 March 2020 and 18 May 2020 were analysed.

main outcome measuresThe endpoints of the study were COVID-19 test positivity and hospitalisation. Forty-two individuals' demographics, psychosocial factors and comorbidities were used as likely determinants of outcomes. Gradient boosting machine was used for building prediction models.

resultsOf 4510 individuals tested (51.2% female, mean age=68.5±8.9 years), 29.4% tested positive. Males were more likely to be positive than females (31.6% vs 27.3%, p=0.001). In females, living in more deprived areas, lower income, increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio, working night shifts and living with a greater number of family members were associated with a higher likelihood of COVID-19 positive test. While in males, greater body mass index and LDL to HDL ratio were the factors associated with a positive test. Older age and adverse cardiometabolic characteristics were the most prominent variables associated with hospitalisation of test-positive patients in both overall and sex-stratified models.

conclusionHigh-risk jobs, crowded living arrangements and living in deprived areas were associated with increased COVID-19 infection in females, while high-risk cardiometabolic characteristics were more influential in males. Gender-related factors have a greater impact on females; hence, they should be considered in identifying priority groups for COVID-19 infection vaccination campaigns.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCOVID-19AgedBiological Specimen BanksCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUnited KingdomCOVID-19health policyrisk management

Identifiers

PMID35584867
PMCPMC9118360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.