ArticleUrology2022
Favorable Outcomes With Early Component Separation, Primary Closure of Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections of the Genitalia (Fournier's Gangrene) Debridement Wound Defects.
Article in Urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing techniques and outcomes in scrotal reconstruction: A sudanese cohort study.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Modern Management of Fournier's Gangrene.Current urology reports · 2025Review
- Progress in Multidisciplinary Treatment of Fournier's Gangrene.Infection and drug resistance · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of early necrotizing soft-tissue infections of the genitalia (NSTIG) component separation, primary wound closure (CSC). We hypothesized that early CSC would be safe, decrease the need for split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) and decrease wound convalescence time. MATERIALS/
methodsManagement of consecutive NSTIG patients from a single institution were evaluated. Three cohorts emerged: 1) those managed/closed by a reconstructive urologist (URO) using CSC principles (wide genital tissue mobilization with primary closure, when possible, +/- STSG), 2) those managed/closed by the general surgery/burn service, and 3) those managed conservatively with secondary closure. Total NSTIG anatomic extent (AE) was determined by assessing involvement of the penis, scrotum, perineum and suprapubic region, and ranged from 1 (<50% involvement of one area) to 8 (>50% involvement in all 4 areas).
resultsOf 84 FG patients meeting study criteria, 48 (57%) were closed primarily and 36 were left to heal by secondary intention. AE was greatest in patients managed by general surgery/burn service (4.5 ± 1.5), followed by URO (2.7 ± 1.8) and secondary intention cases (1.3 ± 0.5). Secondary procedure rates were similar between closure/non-closure cohorts (6.3% v 11%; P = 0.67). STSG use was predicted by wound size (though not time to closure)-specifically with suprapubic and/or penile wounds of >50% involvement. Wound convalescence time decreased by 64% when wounds were closed versus left open, controlling for AE.
conclusionEarly, same-admission primary closure of stable NSTIG wounds is safe and decreases wound convalescence time by over 60%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.