Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35584697›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2022

Perceptual enhancement and suppression correlate with V1 neural activity during active sensing.

James E Niemeyer, Seth Akers-Campbell, Aaron Gregoire, Michael A Paradiso

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James E NiemeyerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Seth Akers-CampbellDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Aaron GregoireSchool of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Michael A ParadisoDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: michael_paradiso@brown.edu.
Brown University · USWeill Cornell Medicine · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Predoctoral Neuroscience Training Program in the Neuroscience Graduate Program.T32MH020068 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI LIPSCOMBE, DIANE, SHEINBERG, DAVID L · 1999 to 2025
$7.6M
Interdisciplinary Vision Training ProgramT32EY018080 · NEI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI PARADISO, MICHAEL A · 2007 to 2021
$1.9M
Brain Science Compute ClusterS10OD025181 · OD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI SANES, JEROME N · 2019 to 2019
$600k
NEI NIH HHS T32 EY018080NIH HHS S10 OD025181NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perception in multiple sensory modalities is an active process that involves exploratory behaviors. In humans and other primates, vision results from sensory sampling guided by saccadic eye movements. Saccades are known to modulate visual perception, and a corollary discharge signal associated with saccades appears to establish a sense of visual stability. Neural recordings have shown that saccades also modulate activity widely across the brain. To investigate the neural basis of saccadic effects on perception, simultaneous recordings from multiple neurons in area V1 were made as animals performed a contrast detection task. Perceptual and neural measures were compared when the animal made real saccades that brought a stimulus into V1 receptive fields and when simulated saccades were made (identical retinal stimulation but no eye movement). When real saccades were made and low spatial frequency stimuli were presented, we observed a reduction in both perceptual sensitivity and neural activity compared with simulated saccades; conversely, with higher spatial frequency stimuli, saccades increased visual sensitivity and neural activity. The performance of neural decoders, which used the activity of the population of simultaneously recorded neurons, showed saccade effects on sensitivity that mirrored the frequency-dependent perceptual changes, suggesting that the V1 population activity could support the perceptual effects. A minority of V1 neurons had significant choice probabilities, and the saccades decreased both average choice probability and pairwise noise correlations. Taken together, the findings suggest that a signal related to saccadic eye movements alters V1 spiking to increase the independence of spiking neurons and bias the system toward processing higher spatial frequencies, presumably to enhance object recognition. The effects of saccades on visual perception and noise correlations appear to parallel effects observed in other sensory modalities, suggesting a general principle of active sensory processing.

Indexed as

SaccadesVisual PerceptionAnimalsNeuronsPhotic StimulationReaction TimeVision, Ocularactive perceptionchoice probabilitycontrast sensitivitycorollary dischargeefference copynetwork covarianceneural decoderssaccadic enhancementsaccadic suppressionsensory-motor integration

Identifiers

PMID35584697
PMCPMC9233080
OpenAlexW4280509404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.