Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35584529›Full record

Trial reportRevista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes2022

Comparative study between manitol and sodium picosulfate with magnesium oxide solutions in the preparation for colonoscopy.

Carolina Martins Vissoci, Gustavo Travaglia Santos, Roberta Paiva Duarte, Cristiano Guimarães DO Amaral Pinheiro, Fernando Marinho Marques DA Silva, Vitor Paiva Pires, João Lucas Farias DO Nascimento Rocha, Cassio Silva Coelho, Maria Eduarda Rottili Gomes DE Oliveira

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolina Martins Vissoci- Hospital Regional da Asa Norte, Unidade de Cirurgia Geral - Brasília - DF - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7276-1384
Gustavo Travaglia Santos- Hospital Regional da Asa Norte, Unidade de Cirurgia Geral - Brasília - DF - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8112-902X
Roberta Paiva Duarte- Hospital Regional da Asa Norte, Unidade de Cirurgia Geral - Brasília - DF - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3024-5781
Cristiano Guimarães DO Amaral Pinheiro- Hospital Regional da Asa Norte, Unidade de Cirurgia Geral - Brasília - DF - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9274-7440
Fernando Marinho Marques DA Silva- Hospital Regional da Asa Norte, Unidade de Cirurgia Geral - Brasília - DF - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5578-7793
Vitor Paiva Pires- Hospital Regional da Asa Norte, Unidade de Cirurgia Geral - Brasília - DF - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4810-1615
João Lucas Farias DO Nascimento Rocha- Hospital Regional da Asa Norte, Unidade de Cirurgia Geral - Brasília - DF - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7335-872X
Cassio Silva Coelho- Hospital Regional da Asa Norte, Unidade de Cirurgia Geral - Brasília - DF - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7198-8306
Maria Eduarda Rottili Gomes DE Oliveira- Hospital Regional da Asa Norte, Unidade de Cirurgia Geral - Brasília - DF - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7189-0691
Hospital de Base · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective, randomized and double-blind study aims to compare two different protocols used for bowel preparation in patients scheduled for colonoscopy. The protocols were composed by solutions of Mannitol or sodium picosulfate combined with magnesium oxide. Patients from the proctology outpatient clinic of the General Surgery Unit of the Regional Hospital of Asa Norte (HRAN) comprised the sample of this study. Both the patients and the colonoscopist had no prior knowledge of the substance used to prepare bowel, which was randomly distributed among the participants. Both protocols demonstrated good and similar results regarding the efficiency of colon preparation, although the review of literature shows a difference in favor of preparation made with Mannitol solution regarding the colon neatness during the exam. In line with the literature, patients who used Mannitol solution had more side effects, highlighting the significant difference found for vomiting and sleep impairment. The preparation with Sodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Oxide was significantly superior in relation to the ease of ingestion perceived by the patients.

Indexed as

CatharticsMagnesium OxideCitratesColonoscopyHumansMannitolOrganometallic CompoundsPicolinesProspective StudiesCatharticsCitratesMagnesium OxideMannitolOrganometallic CompoundsPicolinespicosulfate sodium

Identifiers

PMID35584529
PMCPMC10578783
OpenAlexW4286842143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.