Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35584528›Full record

ReviewJornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia2022

Incidental chest findings on coronary CT angiography: a pictorial essay and management proposal.

Erique Pinto, Diana Penha, Bruno Hochhegger, Colin Monaghan, Edson Marchiori, Luís Taborda-Barata, Klaus Irion

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Erique Pinto. Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6648-9270
Diana Penha. Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3358-6875
Bruno Hochhegger. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-1984-4636
Colin Monaghan. Imaging Department, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5300-0229
Edson Marchiori. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (RJ) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-8797-7380
Luís Taborda-Barata. Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6649-8890
Klaus Irion. Imaging Department, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7860-7879
University of Beira Interior · PTUniversity of Liverpool · GBPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many health systems have been using coronary CT angiography (CCTA) as a first-line examination for ischaemic heart disease patients in various countries. The rising number of CCTA examinations has led to a significant increase in the number of reported incidental extracardiac findings, mainly in the chest. Pulmonary nodules are the most common incidental findings on CCTA scans, as there is a substantial overlap of risk factors between the population seeking to exclude ischaemic heart disease and those at risk of developing lung cancer (i.e., advanced age and smoking habits). However, most incidental findings are clinically insignificant and actively pursuing them could be cost-prohibitive and submit the patient to unnecessary and potentially harmful examinations. Furthermore, there is little consensus regarding when to report or actively exclude these findings and how to manage them, that is, when to trigger an alert or to immediately refer the patient to a pulmonologist, a thoracic surgeon or a multidisciplinary team. This pictorial essay discusses the current literature on this topic and is illustrated with a review of CCTA scans. We also propose a checklist organised by organ and system, recommending actions to raise awareness of pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons, cardiologists and radiologists regarding the most significant and actionable incidental findings on CCTA scans.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary AngiographyHumansIncidental FindingsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID35584528
PMCPMC9064655
OpenAlexW4285742048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.