Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35583972›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2022

Resolving the time course of visual and auditory object categorization.

Polina Iamshchinina, Agnessa Karapetian, Daniel Kaiser, Radoslaw M Cichy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Enhanced Neural Decoding With Optically Pumped Magnetometer MEG Using Multivariate Pattern Analysis.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Polina IamshchininaDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4762-924X
Agnessa KarapetianDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4853-7187
Daniel KaiserDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Physics, Geography, Mathematical Institute, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Gießen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9007-3160
Radoslaw M CichyDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4190-6071

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans can effortlessly categorize objects, both when they are conveyed through visual images and spoken words. To resolve the neural correlates of object categorization, studies have so far primarily focused on the visual modality. It is therefore still unclear how the brain extracts categorical information from auditory signals. In the current study, we used EEG (

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingAuditory PerceptionCognitionHumansPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationVision, Ocularauditory modalityEEGMVPAobject categorizationvisual modality

Identifiers

PMID35583972
PMCPMC9190735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.