Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35583963›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2022

Who cares where the doctors are? The expectation of mobility and its effect on health outcomes.

Liz Brewster, Michael Lambert, Cliff Shelton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liz BrewsterLancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3604-2897
Michael LambertDepartment of Sociology, Lancaster University, Bowland North, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5134-0131
Cliff SheltonLancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8438-398X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doctors are typically portrayed as active agents in their work lives. However, this paper argues that this construction of agency ignores the effects of the healthcare structures that constrain choice, which in turn affects population health outcomes. Medical training pathways, regional boundaries, and rationalisation all have a long-lasting impact on the provision of healthcare. Using a mobilities lens to examine the movement of doctors, this paper examines how the expectation of movement built into training programmes perpetuates unequal access to healthcare. Long waiting times, poor care quality and lack of preventative care all perpetuate health inequalities; as one of the socio-economic determinants, access to healthcare affects health outcomes.

Indexed as

MotivationPhysiciansHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of Health Carehealth inequalitiesmedical careersmobilitiesworkforce planning

Identifiers

PMID35583963
PMCPMC9545762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.