ArticleJAMA psychiatry2022
Clinical, Brain, and Multilevel Clustering in Early Psychosis and Affective Stages.
Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multivariate brain-behaviour associations in psychiatric disorders.Translational psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Psychosocial Interventions, Recovery, and Mediating Mechanisms in Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Ensemble clustering: A practical tutorial.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Disentangling white matter correlates of symptom severity and general impairment in early psychosis.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Neuroimaging-Based Subgroups in Schizophrenia: A Critical Appraisal of Clustering Studies.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2026Review
- Detection of psychosis risk: reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States interview (CAARMS-S).Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Salience network segregation and symptom profiles in psychosis risk subgroups among youth and early adults.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Active treatment of affective disturbances may improve functional outcomes in patients in the early state of psychosis: Results of the PRONIA study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025Article
- Cognitive subtypes in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
- Practical AI application in psychiatry: historical review and future directions.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Review
- Differentiating biomarker features and familial characteristics of B-SNIP psychosis Biotypes.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- The MR neuroimaging protocol for the Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia Program.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Neurobiology-based cognitive biotypes using multi-scale intrinsic connectivity networks in psychotic disorders.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- A generalized reward processing deficit pathway to negative symptoms across diagnostic boundaries.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
- Environmentally derived subgroups of preadolescents with family history of substance use exhibit distinct patterns of psychopathology and reward-related behaviors: insights from the ABCD study.Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry · 2025Article
- Identification of distinct clinical profiles and trajectories in individuals at high risk of developing psychosis: A latent profile analysis of the north American prodrome longitudinal study consortium-3 dataset.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia (AMP® SCZ): Rationale and Study Design of the Largest Global Prospective Cohort Study of Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2024Article
- The multimodal Munich Clinical Deep Phenotyping study to bridge the translational gap in severe mental illness treatment research.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Hippocampal circuit dysfunction in psychosis.Translational psychiatry · 2022Review
- Clusters of psychosis: compensation as a contributor to the heterogeneity of schizophrenia.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPNArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
52 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Approaches are needed to stratify individuals in early psychosis stages beyond positive symptom severity to investigate specificity related to affective and normative variation and to validate solutions with premorbid, longitudinal, and genetic risk measures. Objective: To use machine learning techniques to cluster, compare, and combine subgroup solutions using clinical and brain structural imaging data from early psychosis and depression stages. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multisite, naturalistic, longitudinal cohort study (10 sites in 5 European countries; including major follow-up intervals at 9 and 18 months) with a referred patient sample of those with clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P), recent-onset psychosis (ROP), recent-onset depression (ROD), and healthy controls were recruited between February 1, 2014, to July 1, 2019. Data were analyzed between January 2020 and January 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: A nonnegative matrix factorization technique separately decomposed clinical (287 variables) and parcellated brain structural volume (204 gray, white, and cerebrospinal fluid regions) data across CHR-P, ROP, ROD, and healthy controls study groups. Stability criteria determined cluster number using nested cross-validation. Validation targets were compared across subgroup solutions (premorbid, longitudinal, and schizophrenia polygenic risk scores). Multiclass supervised machine learning produced a transferable solution to the validation sample. Results: There were a total of 749 individuals in the discovery group and 610 individuals in the validation group. Individuals included those with CHR-P (n = 287), ROP (n = 323), ROD (n = 285), and healthy controls (n = 464), The mean (SD) age was 25.1 (5.9) years, and 702 (51.7%) were female. A clinical 4-dimensional solution separated individuals based on positive symptoms, negative symptoms, depression, and functioning, demonstrating associations with all validation targets. Brain clustering revealed a subgroup with distributed brain volume reductions associated with negative symptoms, reduced performance IQ, and increased schizophrenia polygenic risk scores. Multilevel results distinguished between normative and illness-related brain differences. Subgroup results were largely validated in the external sample. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this longitudinal cohort study provide stratifications beyond the expression of positive symptoms that cut across illness stages and diagnoses. Clinical results suggest the importance of negative symptoms, depression, and functioning. Brain results suggest substantial overlap across illness stages and normative variation, which may highlight a vulnerability signature independent from specific presentations. Premorbid, longitudinal, and genetic risk validation suggested clinical importance of the subgroups to preventive treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.