ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022
Contrast-to-Noise Ratios to Evaluate the Detection of Glaucomatous Progression in the Superior and Inferior Hemiretina.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the sensitivity of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and standard automated perimetry (SAP) for detecting glaucomatous progression in the superior and inferior hemiretina. Methods: We calculated contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) for OCT retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness of hemiretinas and for SAP mean total deviation (MTD) of the corresponding hemifields from longitudinal data (205 eyes, 125 participants). The glaucoma stage for each hemiretina was based on the corresponding hemifield's MTD. Contrast was defined as the difference of the parameter between two consecutive glaucoma stages, whereas noise was the measurement variability of the parameter in those stages. The higher the CNR of a parameter, the more sensitive it is to detecting progression in the transition between successive stages. Results: There were no statistically significant differences for the RNFL CNR and MTD CNR between superior and inferior hemiretinas. As the glaucoma stage of the opposite hemiretina worsened, the MTD CNR in the transition from moderate to advanced glaucoma significantly increased. The RNFL CNR in the transition from mild to moderate glaucoma significantly decreased in case of advanced glaucoma in the opposite hemiretina. Conclusions: Similar to full retinas, detecting conversion to glaucoma in hemiretinas is more sensitive with OCT than SAP, whereas with more advanced disease, SAP is more sensitive for detecting progression. More importantly, the sensitivity for detecting progression in one hemiretina with either technique depends on the glaucoma severity in the opposite hemiretina. Translational Relevance: Monitoring glaucomatous progression with either OCT or SAP partly depends on the glaucoma severity in the opposite hemiretina.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.