Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35583875›Full record

ReviewJAMA cardiology2022

Lipoprotein(a) and its Significance in Cardiovascular Disease: A Review.

Freddy Duarte Lau, Robert P Giugliano

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06604117 (A Prospective, Open-label Study Evaluating the Effects of Probucol Combined with Statins on Atherosclerotic Characteristics and Prognosis in Patients with Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 191 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
191citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
72.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06604117 recruitingstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Open-label Study Evaluating the Effects of Probucol Combined with Statins on Atherosclerotic Characteristics and Prognosis in Patients with Ischemic Stroke

Ran2024Enrolled200Registered outcomes6Posted comparisons0ConditionsAtherosclerosis of Artery, Ischemic Stroke, Lipid Disorder, StatinArmsProbucol, Statin
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

191 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 348 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Lipoprotein(a), remote ischemic conditioning, and stroke recurrence in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Gaps and disparities in Lp(a) testing before universal screening: A 10-year analysis.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

131 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Freddy Duarte LauDepartment of Medicine, Yale New Haven Health, Bridgeport, Connecticut.
Robert P GiuglianoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Bridgeport Hospital · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-like particle bound to apolipoprotein(a). This novel marker of cardiovascular disease acts through induction of vascular inflammation, atherogenesis, calcification, and thrombosis. While an absolute risk threshold remains to be universally accepted, an estimated 20% to 25% of the global population have Lp(a) levels of 50 mg/dL or higher, a level noted by the European Atherosclerosis Society to confer increased cardiovascular risk. Observations: Compelling evidence from pathophysiological, observational, and genetic studies suggest a potentially causal association between high Lp(a) levels, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and calcific aortic valve stenosis. Additional evidence has demonstrated that elevated Lp(a) levels are associated with a residual cardiovascular risk despite traditional risk factor optimization, including LDL cholesterol reduction. These findings have led to the formulation of the Lp(a) hypothesis, namely that Lp(a) lowering leads to cardiovascular risk reduction, intensifying the search for Lp(a)-reducing therapies. The ineffectiveness of lifestyle modification, statins, and ezetimibe to lower Lp(a); the modest Lp(a) reduction with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors; the adverse effect profile and unclear cardiovascular benefit of pharmacotherapies such as niacin and mipomersen; and the impracticality of regular lipoprotein apheresis represent major challenges to currently available therapies. Nevertheless, emerging nucleic acid-based therapies, such as the antisense oligonucleotide pelacarsen and the small interfering RNA olpasiran, are generating interest because of their potent Lp(a)-lowering effects. Assessment of new-onset diabetes in patients achieving very low Lp(a) levels will be important in future trials. Conclusions and Relevance: Epidemiologic and genetic studies suggest a potentially causal association between elevated Lp(a) levels, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and aortic valve stenosis. Emerging nucleic acid-based therapies have potent Lp(a)-lowering effects and appear safe; phase 3 trials will establish whether they improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisAtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsNucleic AcidsHumansLipoprotein(a)Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipoprotein(a)Nucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID35583875
OpenAlexW4280560819

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.