Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35583826›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Urologic oncology patient perspectives during COVID-19 treatment delays.

Anna Faris, Lindsey Herrel, James E Montie, Stephanie Chisolm, Ashley Duby, Daniela Wittmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna FarisDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. fariasan@med.umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9049-1939
Lindsey HerrelDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0221-0784
James E MontieDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7735-9316
Stephanie ChisolmBladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN), Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6194-3163
Ashley DubyDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8271-8857
Daniela WittmannDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9201-7269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe sought to describe patient experiences during COVID-19 related delays in urologic cancer treatment.

methodsWe conducted a mixed methods study with an explanatory-sequential design. Survey findings are presented here. Patients from a Midwestern Cancer Center and the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN) self-reported via survey their experience of treatment delay, patient-provider communication, and coping strategies. We quantified patient distress with an ordinal scale (0-10), based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer (NCCN-DT).

resultsForty-four patients with bladder, prostate, and kidney cancers consented to the survey. Most individuals were male (n = 29; 66%) and older than 61 years of age (n = 34; 77%). Median time since diagnosis was 6 months. Dominant reactions to treatment delay included fear that cancer would progress (n = 22; 50%) and relief at avoiding COVID-19 exposure (n = 19; 43%). Most patients reported feeling that their providers acknowledged their emotions (n = 31; 70%), yet 23 patients (52%) did not receive follow-up phone calls and only 24 (55%) felt continually supported by their providers. Patients' median distress level was 5/10 with 68% (n = 30) of patients reaching a clinically significant level of distress (≥ 4). Thematically grouped suggestions for providers included better communication, more personalized support, and better patient education.

conclusionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, a high proportion of urologic cancer patients reached a clinically significant level of distress. While they felt concern from providers, they desired more engagement and personalized care.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentUrologic NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMedical OncologyPandemicsCancer patientsCOVID-19DistressStressTreatment delay

Identifiers

PMID35583826
PMCPMC9114822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.