ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022
Peptide Backbone Modifications for the Assessment of Cleavage Site Relevance in Precursors of Signaling Peptides.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The physiological relevance of site-specific precursor processing for the biogenesis of peptide hormones and growth factors can be demonstrated in genetic complementation experiments, in which a gain of function is observed for the cleavable wild-type precursor, but not for a non-cleavable precursor mutant. Similarly, cleavable and non-cleavable synthetic peptides can be used in bioassays to test whether processing is required for bioactivity. In genetic complementation experiments, site-directed mutagenesis has to be used to mask a processing site against proteolysis. Peptide-based bioassays have the distinctive advantage that peptides can be protected against proteolytic cleavage by backbone modifications, i.e., without changing the amino acid sequence. Peptide backbone modifications have been employed to increase the metabolic stability of peptide drugs, and in basic research, to investigate whether processing at a certain site is required for precursor maturation and formation of the bioactive peptide. For this approach, it is important to show that modification of the peptide backbone has the desired effect and does indeed protect the respective peptide bond against proteolysis. This can be accomplished with the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry-based assay we describe here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.