Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35583724›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of hematology2022

Novel immunotherapies in multiple myeloma.

Ken Ohmine, Ryosuke Uchibori

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Targets for CAR Therapy in Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ken OhmineDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan. omineken@jichi.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6847-3056
Ryosuke UchiboriDivision of Immuno-Gene and Cell Therapy (Takara Bio), Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Jichi Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For a substantial period, options for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) were limited; however, the advent of novel therapies into clinical practice in the 1990s resulted in dramatic changes in the prognosis of the disease. Subsequently, new proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulators with innovations in efficacy and toxicity were introduced; yet there remains a spectrum of patients with poor outcomes with current treatment strategies. One of the causes of disease progression in MM is the loss of the ability of the dysfunctional immune environment to control virulent cell clones. In recent years, therapies to overcome the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and activate the host immune system have shown promise in MM, especially in relapsed and refractory disease. Clinical use of this approach has been approved for several immunotherapies, and a number of studies are currently underway in clinical trials. This review outlines three of the newest and most promising approaches being investigated to enhance the immune system against MM: (1) overcoming immunosuppression with checkpoint inhibitors, (2) boosting immunity against tumors with vaccines, and (3) enhancing immune effectors with adoptive cell therapy. Information on the latest clinical trials in each class will be provided, and further developments will be discussed.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunotherapyImmunotherapy, AdoptiveTumor MicroenvironmentImmunologic FactorsChimeric antigen receptorImmune checkpoint inhibitorImmunotherapyMultiple myelomaVaccine

Identifiers

PMID35583724
OpenAlexW4280600308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.