ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2022
Homing in on cognition with cross-sectional analysis of sarcopenia-related measurements: the SARCOG study.
Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cognitive Sarcopenia: Prevalence and the Risk for Mortality and Healthy Aging in the KORA-Age Study.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Article
- Muscle density, but not size, is independently associated with cognitive health in older adults with hip fractures.JBMR plus · 2024Article
- Predictive modeling of frailty status in elderly abdominal surgery patients by preoperative quadriceps ultrasound testing.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- The longitudinal bidirectional association between sarcopenia and cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults: Findings from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.Journal of global health · 2023Article
- Ultrasonographic/regional muscle measurements for diagnosing sarcopenia in older adults with and without dementia.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCognitive impairment may cause significant decline in muscle function and physical performance via affecting the neuromotor control.
aimTo investigate the relationship between cognition and sarcopenia-related parameters in middle-aged and older adults.
methodsDemographic data and comorbidities of adults ≥ 45-year-old were noted. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to evaluate global cognitive function. Sonographic anterior midthigh muscle thickness, handgrip strength, chair stand test (CST) and gait speed were measured. The diagnosis of sarcopenia was established if low muscle mass was combined with low muscle function. Dynapenia was defined as low grip strength or increased CST duration.
resultsAmong 1542 subjects (477 M, 1065 F), sarcopenia and dynapenia were detected in 22.6 and 17.2% of males, and 17.2 and 25.3% of females, respectively. Sarcopenic patients were older and had higher body mass index, higher frequencies of hypertension, diabetes mellitus and obesity. They had lower muscle thickness, grip strength in males only, CST performance in females only and gait speed than the other groups (all p < 0.05). Sarcopenic and dynapenic patients had similar MMSE scores which were lower than those of normal subjects (both p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding factors, MMSE values were positively related with grip strength in females only, CST performance and gait speed (all p < 0.001); but not with muscle thickness in either gender.
conclusionCognitive impairment may unfavorably affect muscle function and physical performance, but not muscle mass. Accordingly, its prompt management can help to decrease patient morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.