Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35583717›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2022

The absolute number of leukocytes per vial as a major cause of early false positive blood cultures: proof-of-concept and application.

Camille Petit, Philippe Lavrard-Meyer, Didier Raoult, Grégory Dubourg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. In-depth analysis of sampling practice and yield of blood cultures.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Camille PetitAix-Marseille Université, IRD, AP‑HM, MEPHI, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, 19‑21 Boulevard Jean Moulin, Cedex 5, 13385, Marseille, France.
Philippe Lavrard-MeyerAix-Marseille Université, IRD, AP‑HM, MEPHI, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, 19‑21 Boulevard Jean Moulin, Cedex 5, 13385, Marseille, France.
Didier RaoultAix-Marseille Université, IRD, AP‑HM, MEPHI, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, 19‑21 Boulevard Jean Moulin, Cedex 5, 13385, Marseille, France.
Grégory DubourgAix-Marseille Université, IRD, AP‑HM, MEPHI, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, 19‑21 Boulevard Jean Moulin, Cedex 5, 13385, Marseille, France. greg.dubourg@gmail.com.
Méditerranée Infection Foundation · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood cultures detected as positive by the automated system but negative by microscopy and subculture are considered as "false-positives." Several causes have been identified, including hyperleukocytosis or the presence of fastidious bacteria, but as many cases remain unexplained we aimed to investigate the false positives occurring in our laboratory. We retrospectively collected data on blood cultures received over a period of 12 months to determine factors associated with the false-positive vials. We then prospectively validated our findings on the false-positive results occurring over a 3.5-month period. We finally applied scanning electron microscopy (SEM) on 63 false positives and molecular approaches on a subset of them. In the retrospective study, 154 (85%) of the 181 false-positive identified were positive following less than 4 h of incubation and were considered as "early false-positives." By performing ROC curves on these early false positives, we demonstrate that the absolute number of leukocytes is in fact the most discriminating factor of early false positivity (p < 0.001). This phenomenon can be the consequence of either a high blood culture volume (p < 0.001) or hyperleukocytosis (p < 0.001). In the prospective study, the use of a threshold of 219 million of leukocytes per vial enabled the identification of 97% of the early false positives. Finally, SEM and specific qPCR enabled three additional identifications while 16S rRNA/nanopore sequencing enabled the detection of Helicobacter cinaedi bacteremia and a polymicrobial infection. A high absolute number of leukocytes in blood cultures explains most false positives, thereby making it possible to target additional microbiological investigations.

Indexed as

BacteremiaBlood CultureFalse Positive ReactionsHumansLeukocytesProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBlood culturesFalse positiveLeukocyteScanning electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID35583717
OpenAlexW4280525926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.