Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35583584›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2022

Optimal Length of Biliopancreatic Limb in Single Anastomosis Sleeve Gastrointestinal Bypass for Treatment of Severe Obesity: Efficacy and Concerns.

Seyed Vahid Hosseini, Nader Moeinvaziri, Pourya Medhati, Iman Hesameddini, Hooman Kamran, Mohammed Abd Zaid Akool, Neda Haghighat

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seyed Vahid HosseiniLaparascopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Nader MoeinvaziriLaparascopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Pourya MedhatiLaparascopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Iman HesameddiniColorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hooman KamranLaparascopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammed Abd Zaid AkoolDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Jabir Ibn Hayyan Medical University, Najaf, Iraq.
Neda HaghighatLaparascopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. neda.hag@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2749-4306
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present study aimed to compare two newly introduced procedures, single anastomosis sleeve jejunal (SASJ) with ileal (SASI) bypass in terms of weight loss, remission of obesity-associated medical problems, complications, and nutritional status. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study was carried out with 162 patients who underwent single anastomosis sleeve gastrointestinal bypass from October 2017 to September 2021, either single anastomosis sleeve jejunal bypass (SASJ) or single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI). The main outcome measures were weight loss and improvement in obesity-associated medical problems, nutritional status, and complications at 12 months post-surgery.

resultsAt 12 months, both groups showed significant weight loss and remission in obesity-associated medical problems. There were significant differences in body mass index (BMI), total weight loss (TWL), and excess weight loss (EWL) between SASI and SASJ bypass (P < 0.05). Improvements in associated medical problems after the two procedures were similar except for hypertension. The reversal surgery rate of the SASI group was significantly higher than that of the SASJ group (5.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.03).

conclusionsSASJ and SASI bypass achieved satisfactory weight loss and improvement in obesity-associated medical problems that were comparable between the two groups. SASI bypass was followed by a significant difference in the rate of reversal surgery at 1 year due to a short common channel, which was not observed after SASJ bypass.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassObesity, MorbidAnastomosis, SurgicalGastrectomyHumansJejunumRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossSASI bypassSevere obesitySingle anastomosisSleeve ilealSleeve jejunal

Identifiers

PMID35583584
OpenAlexW4280549689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.