ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2022
Combining PGT-A with PGT-M risks trying to do too much.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The ART of Embryo Selection: A Review of Methods to Rank the Most Competent Embryo(s) for Transfer to Optimize IVF Success.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Artificial Uterus and Artificial Embryos: Unsolved Tasks.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025Review
- Should non-invasive prenatal testing be recommended for patients who achieve pregnancy with PGT?BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary objective of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) is to avoid having a child with a serious monogenic disease. Combining testing for unrelated sporadic chromosomal abnormalities (PGT-A) and excluding embryos with chromosomally abnormal results from transfer proffers the chance to mitigate the risk of miscarriage and to reduce the number of embryo transfers, but also risks excluding healthy embryos from transfer due to abnormal test results that do not reflect the true potential of the embryo. The theoretical utility of combining PGT-M with PGT-A is explored in this communication. It is concluded that PGT-M without PGT-A is preferred to achieve an unaffected live birth. Since PGT-M is mostly undertaken by couples where the female partner is younger than 35 years, PGT-A is likely to marginally mitigate the risk of miscarriage. Experimental non-selection studies are needed to assess the potential detrimental effect of combining PGT-M with PGT-A in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.