ArticleMedicine2022
Comparison of efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicines for diabetic nephropathy: A protocol for Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Study on the liver Drug's dominant metabolic enzymes for six effective components of the Huang qi Liuyi decoction.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the most serious complications of diabetes. It has become a global public health problem among humans. DN is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease. At present, there is no specific medicine or modern medicinal therapy. In recent years, studies have shown that traditional Chinese patent medicines have been effective in treating DN, with few side effects. There is no systematic review on the treatment of DN with Chinese patent medicines. The current systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicines for the treatment of DN.
methodsWe will develop a search strategy to search major Chinese and English databases from inception to February 25, 2022 for randomized controlled trials examining the use of traditional Chinese patent medicine for the treatment of DN. The search will be conducted in accordance with the participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes (PICOS) framework. Two researchers will use EndnoteX9 software to extract data and independently evaluate the quality of the included trials. Finally, the Bayesian network meta-analysis will be carried out by using software such as ReviewManager, Stata16.0, and WinBUGS1.4.3.
resultsThe primary outcomes will be urine albumin excretion rate, urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, total effective rate, and adverse events, and the secondary outcomes will be body mass index, fasting blood glucose, and 2-hPG during 75-g OGTT. These outcomes will be examined to provide a reliable basis for the treatment of DN with different traditional Chinese patent medicines.
conclusionThis review will compare the efficacy and safety of different traditional Chinese patent medicines for treating DN. The results of the study will provide a basis for the selection of adjuvant treatment options for DN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.