SynthesisInternational wound journal2023
The influence of Chinese herbal medicines on cancer-related pressure ulcer wound, fatigue, constipation, and anorexia: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The influence of Chinese herbal medicines on cancer-related pressure ulcer wound, fatigue, constipation, and anorexia: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2023Pooled it
- RETRACTION: The influence of Chinese Herbal Medicines on Cancer-Related Pressure Ulcer Wound, Fatigue, Constipation, and Anorexia: A Meta-Analysis.International wound journal · 2025Article
- Vitamin D and cancer-related fatigue in elderly patients: mechanisms and therapeutic insights-a narrative review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Phytochemistry and antifatigue activities ofNarra J · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-03-26Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of Chinese herbal medicines on cancer-related pressure ulcer wounds, fatigue, constipation, and anorexia. A systematic literature search up to March 2022 was done and 25 studies included 1777 subjects with cancer-related symptoms at the start of the study; 953 of them were provided with Chinese herbal medicines and 824 were control. They were reporting relationships about the influence of Chinese herbal medicines on cancer-related pressure ulcer wounds, fatigue, constipation, and anorexia. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the influence of Chinese herbal medicines on cancer-related pressure ulcer wounds, fatigue, constipation, and anorexia using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Chinese herbal medicines had significantly higher effectiveness in treating pressure ulcer wound (OR, 5.94; 95% CI, 3.94-8.95, P < .001), fatigue (OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.78-4.41, P < .001), and effectiveness on treating constipation (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.57-4.25, P < .001) compared to control in subjects with cancer-related symptoms. However, Chinese herbal medicines had no significant effect on treating anorexia (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.61-4.66, P = .31) compared to control in subjects with cancer-related symptoms. Chinese herbal medicines had significantly higher effectiveness in treating pressure ulcer wound, treating pressure ulcer wound, fatigue, and constipation compared to control in subjects with cancer-related symptoms. However, Chinese herbal medicines had no significant effect on the effectiveness of treating anorexia compared to control in subjects with cancer-related symptoms. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.