Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35582797›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Unexpected morphological diversity in ancient dogs compared to modern relatives.

Colline Brassard, Adrian Bălăşescu, Rose-Marie Arbogast, Vianney Forest, Céline Bemilli, Adina Boroneanţ, Fabien Convertini, Muriel Gandelin, Valentin Radu, Patricia A Fleming and 8 more

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Two species, two stories: divergent morphometric evolution of sheep and goats over the last 8000 years.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Colline BrassardAASPE-UMR 7209, CNRS-Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9789-2708
Adrian BălăşescuVasile Pârvan Institute of Archaeology, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania.
Rose-Marie ArbogastARCHIMEDE-UMR 7044, Strasbourg, France.
Vianney ForestInstitut National de Recherches Archéologiques Préventives (INRAP) Midi-Méditerranée, 30900 Nîmes, France.
Céline BemilliAASPE-UMR 7209, CNRS-Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
Adina BoroneanţVasile Pârvan Institute of Archaeology, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania.
Fabien ConvertiniInstitut National de Recherches Archéologiques Préventives (INRAP) Midi-Méditerranée, 30900 Nîmes, France.
Muriel GandelinInstitut National de Recherches Archéologiques Préventives (INRAP) Midi-Méditerranée, 30900 Nîmes, France.
Valentin RaduNational Museum of Romanian History, Bucharest, Romania.
Patricia A FlemingEnvironmental and Conservation Sciences, Harry Butler Research Centre, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Claude GuintardLaboratoire d'Anatomie comparée, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire, de l'Agroalimentaire et de l'Alimentation, Nantes Atlantique - ONIRIS, Nantes, France.
Tracey L KreplinsEnvironmental and Conservation Sciences, Harry Butler Research Centre, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Cécile CallouAASPE-UMR 7209, CNRS-Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
Andréa FilippoAASPE-UMR 7209, CNRS-Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
Anne TressetAASPE-UMR 7209, CNRS-Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
Raphaël CornetteISYEB-UMR7205, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles, Paris, France.
Anthony HerrelMECADEV-UMR 7179, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, France.
Stéphanie BréhardAASPE-UMR 7209, CNRS-Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5462-4754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dogs are among the most variable species today, but little is known about the morphological variability in the early phases of their history. The Neolithic transition to farming may have resulted in an early morphological diversification as a result of changes in the anthropic environment or intentional selection on specific morphologies. Here, we describe the variability and modularity in mandible form by comparing 525 dog mandibles from European archaeological sites ranging from 8100 to 3000 cal. BC to a reference sample of modern dogs, wolves, and dingoes. We use three-dimensional geometric morphometrics to quantify the form of complete and fragmented mandibles. We demonstrate that an important morphological variability already existed before the Bronze Age in Europe, yet the largest, smallest, most brachycephalic or dolichocephalic extant dogs have no equivalent in the archaeological sample, resulting in a lower variation compared to modern relatives. The covariation between the anterior and posterior parts of the mandible is lower in archaeological dogs, suggesting a low degree of intentional human selection in early periods. The mandible of modern and ancient dogs differs in functionally important areas, possibly reflecting differences in diet, competition, or the implication of ancient dogs in hunting or defence.

Indexed as

WolvesAgricultureAnimalsArchaeologyDogsEuropeHistory, AncientMandiblechalcolithicdogmandibleneolithicshape

Identifiers

PMID35582797
PMCPMC9115036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.