Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35582761›Full record

ReviewEpilepsia2022

Statins as antiepileptogenic drugs: Analyzing the evidence and identifying the most promising statin.

Yousif Hufthy, Mahima Bharadwaj, Shubhi Gupta, Delwar Hussain, Prince Josiah Sajanthan Joseph, Alizah Khan, Jessica King, Pieter Lahorgue, Ovin Jayawardena, Danial Rostami-Hochaghan and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. New epilepsy therapies in development.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Statins: Masked anti-epileptic warriors.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yousif HufthySchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Mahima BharadwajSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Shubhi GuptaSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Delwar HussainSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Prince Josiah Sajanthan JosephSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6689-1120
Alizah KhanSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jessica KingSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Pieter LahorgueSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ovin JayawardenaSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Danial Rostami-HochaghanSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Chloe SmithSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Anthony MarsonDepartment of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Nasir MirzaDepartment of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3538-0117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many brain insults and injuries are "epileptogenic": they increase the risk of developing epilepsy. It is desirable to identify treatments that are "antiepileptogenic": treatments that prevent the development of epilepsy, if administered after the occurrence of an epileptogenic insult. Current antiepileptic drugs are not antiepileptogenic, but evidence of antiepileptogenic efficacy is accumulating for a growing number of other compounds. From among these candidate compounds, statins are deserving of particular attention because statins are reported to be antiepileptogenic in more published studies and in a wider range of brain insults than any other individual or class of compounds. Although many studies report the antiepileptogenic effect of statins, it is unclear how many studies provide evidence that statins exhibit the following two essential features of a clinically viable antiepileptogenic drug: the drug must exert an antiepileptogenic effect even if it is initiated after the epileptogenic brain insult has already occurred, and the antiepileptogenic effect must endure even after the drug has been discontinued. In the current work, we interrogate published preclinical and clinical studies, to determine if statins fulfill these essential requirements. There are eight different statins in clinical use. To enable the clinical use of one of these statins for antiepileptogenesis, its antiepileptogenic effect will have to be established through future time- and resource-intensive clinical trials. Therefore, it is desirable to review the published literature to determine which of the statins emerges as the most promising candidate for antiepileptogenic therapy. Hence, in the current work, we also collate and analyze published data-clinical and pre-clinical, direct and indirect-that help to answer the question: Which statin is the most promising candidate to take forward into an antiepileptogenesis clinical trial?

Indexed as

EpilepsyHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAnticonvulsantsBrainHumansAnticonvulsantsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorsantiepileptogenesisdrug repurposingepilepsyepileptogenesis

Identifiers

PMID35582761
PMCPMC9541605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.