ReviewEpilepsia2022
Statins as antiepileptogenic drugs: Analyzing the evidence and identifying the most promising statin.
Review in Epilepsia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selected Molecular Targets for Counteracting Epileptogenesis: What Do We Know About Its Effective Inhibition?Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Continuous Versus Short EEG After Ischemic Stroke: What cEEG Adds for Detecting Abnormalities and Predicting Post-Stroke Epilepsy.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Article
- Post-stroke seizures: classification, risk prediction, and management.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Epilepsy as a dynamic disease: Toward actionable, individualized seizure risk prediction.Epilepsia · 2025Review
- Statins' protective effects on focal epilepsy are independent of LDL-C.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Pharmacological strategies for preventing post-stroke seizures and epilepsy.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Prognostic models for seizures and epilepsy after stroke, tumors and traumatic brain injury.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2025Review
- Enhancing the human health and lifespan: a targeted strategy emphasizing statins.Biogerontology · 2024Review
- New epilepsy therapies in development.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2024Review
- Krüppel-like factors: potential roles in blood-brain barrier dysfunction and epileptogenesis.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2024Review
- Antiepileptogenic Effects of Anakinra, Lamotrigine and Their Combination in a Lithium-Pilocarpine Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy in Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Emerging Molecular Targets for Anti-Epileptogenic and Epilepsy Modifying Drugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Editorial: Epilepsy and dementia in stroke survivors.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Statins: Masked anti-epileptic warriors.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Statins as antiepileptogenic drugs: Analyzing the evidence and identifying the most promising statin.Epilepsia · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many brain insults and injuries are "epileptogenic": they increase the risk of developing epilepsy. It is desirable to identify treatments that are "antiepileptogenic": treatments that prevent the development of epilepsy, if administered after the occurrence of an epileptogenic insult. Current antiepileptic drugs are not antiepileptogenic, but evidence of antiepileptogenic efficacy is accumulating for a growing number of other compounds. From among these candidate compounds, statins are deserving of particular attention because statins are reported to be antiepileptogenic in more published studies and in a wider range of brain insults than any other individual or class of compounds. Although many studies report the antiepileptogenic effect of statins, it is unclear how many studies provide evidence that statins exhibit the following two essential features of a clinically viable antiepileptogenic drug: the drug must exert an antiepileptogenic effect even if it is initiated after the epileptogenic brain insult has already occurred, and the antiepileptogenic effect must endure even after the drug has been discontinued. In the current work, we interrogate published preclinical and clinical studies, to determine if statins fulfill these essential requirements. There are eight different statins in clinical use. To enable the clinical use of one of these statins for antiepileptogenesis, its antiepileptogenic effect will have to be established through future time- and resource-intensive clinical trials. Therefore, it is desirable to review the published literature to determine which of the statins emerges as the most promising candidate for antiepileptogenic therapy. Hence, in the current work, we also collate and analyze published data-clinical and pre-clinical, direct and indirect-that help to answer the question: Which statin is the most promising candidate to take forward into an antiepileptogenesis clinical trial?
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.