Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35582647›Full record

ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2022

Testing delay in an environment of low COVID-19 prevalence: A qualitative study of testing behaviour amongst symptomatic South Australians.

Emma Tonkin, Heath Pillen, Samantha B Meyer, Paul R Ward, Clare Beard, Barbara Toson, John Coveney, Julie Henderson, Trevor Webb, Dean McCullum and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Influencing Factors of Delayed Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Gangwon, South Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emma TonkinCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia.
Heath PillenCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia.
Samantha B MeyerSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Paul R WardResearch Centre for Public Health Policy, Torrens University, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.
Clare BeardCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia.
Barbara TosonCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia.
John CoveneyCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia.
Julie HendersonCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia.
Trevor WebbCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia.
Dean McCullumCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia.
Annabelle M WilsonCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: South Australia has to date (October 2021) been highly successful in maintaining an aggressive suppression strategy for the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, continued success of this strategy is dependent on ongoing testing by people with symptoms of COVID-19 to identify, trace and quarantine emergent cases as soon as possible. This study sought to explore community members' decisions about having COVID-19 testing in an environment of low prevalence, specifically exploring their decision-making related to symptoms. Materials and methods: This study drew on a qualitative case study design, involving five focus groups, conducted in May 2021, with 29 individuals who had experienced COVID-19-like symptoms since the commencement of testing in South Australia. Participants detailed their last COVID-19-like illness episode and described their decision-making regarding testing. Data collection methods and analysis were theoretically informed by the capability, opportunity, and motivation behaviour (COM-B) model. Findings: Participants' belief that COVID-19 symptoms would be 'unusual', severe, and persistent caused them to either reject or delay testing. Participants generally employed 'watch and wait' and social distancing behaviour rather than timely presentation to testing. Concern about economic loss associated with isolating after testing, and the potential for illness transmission at testing centres further prevented testing for some participants. Conclusions: In a low COVID-19 prevalence environment, individuals rely on pre-existing strategies for interpreting and managing personal illness (such as delaying help seeking if symptoms are mild), which generally conflict with public health management advice about COVID-19. In low prevalence environments therefore public health authorities must give the public a reason to test

Indexed as

COM-B, CapabilityCOVID-19COVID-19, Coronavirus disease 2019Opportunity, And motivation behaviour modelPCR, Polymerase chain reactionQualitative researchRisk perceptionSymptom appraisalTesting behavior

Identifiers

PMID35582647
PMCPMC9098655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.