Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35582601›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2022

Percutaneous catheter drainage in retroperitoneal abscesses: a single centre's 8-year experience.

Gulsah Yildirim, Hakki Karakas

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gulsah YildirimDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hakki KarakasDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Eğitim Ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We have investigated the technical and clinical success of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in retroperitoneal abscesses and factors that may affect the outcome. Material and methods: The study cohort included 45 patients (17 females and 29 males, with mean age of 56.3 years) that were treated between 2012 and 2020. Forty-seven abscesses were managed with PCD under ultrasonography, computed tomography, or fluoroscopy guidance. Patients' demographics, lesion locations, predisposing factors, clini-cal presentation, etiology, radiological findings, technical factors, and outcome parameters were presented using exploratory and descriptive statistics. Results: Abscesses were located in the psoas ( Conclusions: PCD is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of retroperitoneal abscesses. Procedure-related mortality, morbidity, and complication rates are low. Underlying etiology is a significant factor affecting the outcome. Nevertheless, PCD may provide definitive treatment in the majority of patients.

Indexed as

interventional radiologypercutaneous catheter drainageprognosisretroperitoneal abscesstherapeutic assessment

Identifiers

PMID35582601
PMCPMC9093211
OpenAlexW4285141777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.