Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35582587›Full record

ReviewCancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.)2019

Insights into breast cancer phenotying through molecular omics approaches and therapy response.

Jose E Belizario, Angela F Loggulo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Biomarkers for Early Detection of Cancer: Molecular Aspects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Tumor-derived exosomes in the regulation of macrophage polarization.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2020
    Review
  7. "Pharmacogenetics of Cancer" -Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jose E BelizarioDepartment of Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Avenida Lineu Prestes, 1524, São Paulo, CEP 05508-900, Brazil.
Angela F LogguloDepartment of Pathology, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Sena Madureira, 1500, São Paulo, CEP 04021-001, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the world. Despite advances in early detection and understanding of the molecular bases of breast cancer biology, approximately 30% of all patients with early-stage breast cancer have metastatic disease. Breast cancers are comprised of molecularly distinct subtypes that respond differently to pathway-targeted therapies and neoadjuvant systemic therapy. However, no tumor response is observed in some cases and development of resistance is most commonly seen in patients with heterogeneous breast cancer subtype. To offer better treatment with increased efficacy and low toxicity of selecting therapies, new technologies that incorporate clinical and molecular characteristics of intratumoral heterogeneity have been investigated. This short review provides some examples of integrative omics approaches (genome, epigenome, transcriptome, immune profiling) and mathematical/computational analyses that provide mechanistic and clinically relevant insights into underlying differences in breast cancer subtypes and patients'responses to specific therapies.

Indexed as

Breast cancerendocrine and targeted therapyepigenomicsERBB/HERestrogen receptorgenomicsprogesterone receptorproteomics

Identifiers

PMID35582587
PMCPMC8992536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.