ReviewCancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.)2022
Drug resistance and minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma.
Review in Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liposomal nanoparticles as a drug delivery system for improved treatment of multiple myeloma.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Kidney-Tonifying, Phlegm-Resolving, and Blood Stasis-Removing Therapy for Multiple Myeloma: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial on Epigenetic and Immune Modulation.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Progress of immune senescence in multiple myeloma treatment resistance.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Multiple Myeloma: Key Role in Disease Biology and Potential Therapeutic Implications.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Anti-BCMA novel therapies for multiple myeloma.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2023Review
- Cancer drug resistance in multiple myeloma.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2022Article
- "Friends and foes" of multiple myeloma measurable/minimal residual disease evaluation by next generation flow.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Great progress has been made in improving survival in multiple myeloma (MM) patients over the last 30 years. New drugs have been introduced and complete responses are frequently seen. However, the majority of MM patients do experience a relapse at a variable time after treatment, and ultimately the disease becomes drug-resistant following therapies. Recently, minimal residual disease (MRD) detection has been introduced in clinical trials utilizing novel therapeutic agents to measure the depth of response. MRD can be considered as a surrogate for both progression-free and overall survival. In this perspective, the persistence of a residual therapy-resistant myeloma plasma cell clone can be associated with inferior survivals. The present review gives an overview of drug resistance in MM, i.e., mutation of β5 subunit of the proteasome; upregulation of pumps of efflux; heat shock protein induction for proteasome inhibitors; downregulation of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.