Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35582499›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Implementing a Care Coordination Strategy for Children with Medical Complexity in Ontario, Canada: A Process Evaluation.

Samantha Quartarone, Jia Lu Lilian Lin, Julia Orkin, Nora Fayed, Simon French, Nathalie Major, Joanna Soscia, Audrey Lim, Sanober Diaz, Myla Moretti and 1 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Samantha QuartaroneChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9989-4213
Jia Lu Lilian LinInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0644-6399
Julia OrkinChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4969-2496
Nora FayedSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7114-3971
Simon FrenchDepartment of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, AU.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7061-7706
Nathalie MajorDepartment of Paediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3655-7460
Joanna SosciaDivision of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4558-5607
Audrey LimDepartment of Pediatrics, Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4093-4492
Sanober DiazProvincial Council for Maternal and Child Health, Toronto, Ontario, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8654-6474
Myla MorettiChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0330-7679
Eyal CohenChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0112-7188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A provincial strategy to expand care coordination and integration of care for children with medical complexity (CMC) was launched in Ontario, Canada in 2015. A process evaluation of the roll-out examined the processes, mechanisms of impact, and contextual factors affecting the implementation of the Complex Care for Kids Ontario (CCKO) intervention strategy. Methods: This process evaluation was conducted and analyzed according to the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (UK-MRC) process evaluation framework. To evaluate the implementation of the CCKO intervention, a multi-method study design was used, including semi-structured interviews with 38 key informants and 10 families of CMC involved in CCKO. To further understand implementation details across regional sites, provincial-level implementation plans, and process documents were reviewed. Discussion: Strengths of CCKO included novel collaborations and partnerships between complex care teams, community partners and regional sites. Issues relating to communication and coordination across care sectors created challenges to holistic care coordination objectives. Provincial system fragmentation limited the ability of CCKO to provide seamless care coordination due to the multiple care sectors involved. Conclusion: This study adds to the understanding of the processes involved in a population-level care coordination intervention for CMC. Lessons learned through CCKO can help facilitate reproducibility and necessary adjustments of the intervention in different settings.

Indexed as

care coordinationchildcomplex carefamilymedical complexityprocess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID35582499
PMCPMC9053529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.