Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35582497›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2022

Contribution of Deep-Learning Techniques Toward Fighting COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis of Scholarly Production During 2020.

Janneth Chicaiza, Stephany D Villota, Paola G Vinueza-Naranjo, Ruben Rumipamba-Zambrano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janneth ChicaizaDepartamento de Ciencias de la Computación y ElectrónicaUniversidad Técnica Particular de Loja Loja 110105 Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3439-3618
Stephany D VillotaGestión de Investigación, Desarrollo e InnovaciónInstituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública Quito 170136 Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3250-6589
Paola G Vinueza-NaranjoFacultad de IngenieríaUniversidad Nacional de Chimborazo Riobamba 060108 Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3658-5288
Ruben Rumipamba-ZambranoCorporación Nacional de Telecomunicaciones-CNT E.P. Quito 170528 Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8835-1870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 has dramatically affected various aspects of human society with worldwide repercussions. Firstly, a serious public health issue has been generated, resulting in millions of deaths. Also, the global economy, social coexistence, psychological status, mental health, and the human-environment relationship/dynamics have been seriously affected. Indeed, abrupt changes in our daily lives have been enforced, starting with a mandatory quarantine and the application of biosafety measures. Due to the magnitude of these effects, research efforts from different fields were rapidly concentrated around the current pandemic to mitigate its impact. Among these fields, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Deep Learning (DL) have supported many research papers to help combat COVID-19. The present work addresses a bibliometric analysis of this scholarly production during 2020. Specifically, we analyse quantitative and qualitative indicators that give us insights into the factors that have allowed papers to reach a significant impact on traditional metrics and alternative ones registered in social networks, digital mainstream media, and public policy documents. In this regard, we study the correlations between these different metrics and attributes. Finally, we analyze how the last DL advances have been exploited in the context of the COVID-19 situation.

Indexed as

Bibliometric analysisCOVID-19deep learningscholarly production

Identifiers

PMID35582497
PMCPMC9088792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.