Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35582403›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2022

Cyclic arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-modified red blood cells for drug delivery: Synthesis and

Chen Wang, Min Wang, Yan Zhang, Hongxin Jia, Binbin Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Red blood cells: a potential delivery system.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chen WangDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, Fujian, 361023, China.
Min WangDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, Fujian, 361023, China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, 150076, China.
Hongxin JiaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, 150076, China.
Binbin ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Xiamen Xianyue Hospital, Xiamen, Fujian, 361012, China.
Harbin University of Commerce · CNXiamen University · CN174th hospital of the People's Liberation Army · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Red blood cells (RBCs) are an excellent choice for cell preparation research because of their biocompatibility, high drug loading, and long half-life. In this study, doxorubicin (DOX) was encapsulated with RBCs as the carrier. The biotin-avidin system binding principle was used to modify biotinylated cyclic arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (cRGD) onto RBC surfaces for accurate targeting, high drug loading, and sustained drug release. The RBC drug delivery system (DDS) was characterized, and the concentration of surface sulfur in the energy spectrum was 6.330%. The physical and chemical properties of RBC DDS were as follows: drug content, 0.857 mg/mL; particle size, 3339 nm; potential value, -12.5 mV; and cumulative release rate, 81.35%. There was no significant change in RBC morphology for up to seven days. The results of the targeting and cytotoxicity studies of RBC DDS showed that many RBCs covered the surfaces of U251 cells, and the fluorescence intensity was higher than that of MCF-7 cells. The IC

Indexed as

CytotoxicityDrug deliveryRed blood cellsTargeting

Identifiers

PMID35582403
PMCPMC9091773
OpenAlexW3166505101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.