ArticleHeliyon2022
Clinical safety and pharmacokinetic evaluation of aqueous extract of
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The pipeline for drugs for control and elimination of neglected tropical diseases: 2. Oral anti-infective drugs and drug combinations for off-label use.Parasites & vectors · 2023Review
- Sinococuline, a bioactive compound of Cocculus hirsutus has potent anti-dengue activity.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Dengue a worldwide concern for public health has no effective vaccine or drug available for its prevention or treatment. There are billions of people who are at risk of contracting the dengue virus (DENV) infections with only anti-mosquito strategies to combat this disease. Based on the reports, particularly in vitro studies and small animal studies showing anti-viral activity of aqueous extract of Materials and methods: Sixty healthy adult human subjects were divided into 5 groups (cohorts: I to V; n = 12 per cohort) and randomized in the ratio of 3:1 to receive active treatment or placebo in a blinded manner. Five doses 100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg and 800 mg tablets were administered three times daily at an interval of 8 h for days 01-09 under fasting conditions and a single dose in morning on day 10. Safety assessment was based on monitoring the occurrence, pattern, intensity, and severity of adverse events during study period. Blood samples were collected for measurement of the bio-active marker Sinococuline concentrations by a validated LC-MS/MS method followed by pharmacokinetic evaluation. Results and conclusion: The test formulation was well tolerated in all cohorts. Sinococuline peak plasma concentration (C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.