Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35581951›Full record

Observational studyThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2022

Birth outcomes by type of attendance at antenatal education: An observational study.

Antonia W Shand, Bronwyn Lewis-Jones, Timothy Nielsen, Jane Svensson, Anne Lainchbury, Amanda Henry, Natasha Nassar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06003946 (Effectiveness of a Breathing and Relaxation Technique in Antenatal Education), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06003946 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a Breathing and Relaxation Technique in Antenatal Education (BreLax Study): a Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorZurich University of Applied SciencesRan2023 to 2025Enrolled68ConditionsPregnancyArmsBreLax: Antenatal education class, Standard care (control)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Antonia W ShandChildren's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4200-9295
Bronwyn Lewis-JonesRoyal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Timothy NielsenChildren's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8801-572X
Jane SvenssonRoyal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Anne LainchburyRoyal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Amanda HenrySchool of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7351-8922
Natasha NassarChildren's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3720-9655
Royal Hospital for Women · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntenatal education aims to prepare expectant parents for pregnancy, birth, and parenthood. Studies have reported antenatal education teaching breathing and relaxation methods for pain relief, termed psychoprophylaxis, is associated with reduction in caesarean section rates compared with general birth and parenting classes. Given the rising rates of caesarean section, we aimed to determine whether there was a difference in mode of birth in women based on the type of antenatal education attended. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional antenatal survey of nulliparous women ≥28 weeks gestation with a singleton pregnancy was conducted in two maternity hospitals in Sydney, Australia in 2018. Women were asked what type of antenatal education they attended and sent a follow-up survey post-birth. Hospital birth data were also obtained. Education was classified into four groups: psychoprophylaxis, birth and parenting, other, or none.

resultsFive hundred and five women with birth data were included. A higher proportion of women who attended psychoprophylaxis education had a vaginal birth (instrumental/spontaneous) (79%) compared with women who attended birth and parenting, other or no education (69%, 67%, 60%, respectively P = 0.045). After adjusting for maternal characteristics, birth and hospital factors, the association was attenuated (odds ratio 2.03; 95% CI 0.93-4.43).

conclusionsWomen who attended psychoprophylaxis couple-based education had a trend toward higher rates of vaginal birth. Randomised trials comparing different types of antenatal education are required to determine whether psychoprophylaxis education can reduce caesarean section rates and improve other birth outcomes.

Indexed as

Prenatal EducationCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansParturitionPregnancyPrenatal Careantenatal educationbirthmode of birth

Identifiers

PMID35581951
PMCPMC10083900
OpenAlexW4280581234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.