Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35581899›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2022

Does oscillation size matter? Impact of added resistance on the cerebral pressure-flow Relationship in females and males.

Kailey T Newel, Joel S Burma, Joseph Carere, Courtney M Kennedy, Jonathan D Smirl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review, meta-analysisJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Quantification of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: welcome to the jungle!Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kailey T NewelCerebrovascular Concussion Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Joel S BurmaCerebrovascular Concussion Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9756-5793
Joseph CarereCerebrovascular Concussion Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Courtney M KennedyCerebrovascular Concussion Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jonathan D SmirlCerebrovascular Concussion Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1054-0038
University of Calgary · CAInterior Health · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sinusoidal squat-stand maneuvers (SSM) without resistance have been shown to produce ~30-50 mmHg swings in mean arterial pressure which are largely buffered in the brain via dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA). This study aimed to further elucidate how this regulatory mechanism is affected during SSM with added resistance (~20% bodyweight). Twenty-five participants (sex/gender: 13 females/12 males) completed two bouts of 5-min SSM for both bodyweight and resistance conditions (10% bodyweight in each arm) at frequencies of 0.05 Hz (20-s squat/stand cycles) and 0.10 Hz (10-s squat/stand cycles). Middle and posterior cerebral artery (MCA/PCA) cerebral blood velocities were indexed with transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Beat-to-beat blood pressure (BP) was quantified via finger photoplesmography. Transfer function analysis was employed to quantify dCA in both cerebral arteries across the cardiac cycle (diastole, mean, and systole). Two-by-two Analysis of Variance with generalized eta squared effect sizes were utilized to determine differences between resistance vs. bodyweight squats and between sexes/genders. Absolute mean and diastolic BP were elevated during the resistance squats (p < 0.001); however, only the BP point-estimate power spectrum densities were augmented at 0.10 Hz (p < 0.048). No differences were noted for phase and gain metrics between bodyweight and resistance SSM (p > 0.067); however, females displayed attenuated systolic regulation (p < 0.003). Despite augmented systemic BP during resistance SSM, the brain was effective at buffering the additional stress to mitigate overperfusion/pressure. Females displayed less dCA regulation within the systolic aspect of the cardiac cycle, which may be associated with physiological underpinnings related to various clinical conditions/presentations.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialBlood Flow VelocityBlood PressureFemaleHomeostasisHumansMaleMiddle Cerebral Arterycerebral blood flow regulationdoppler ultrasounddynamic cerebral autoregulationresistance exercisesquat-stand maneuvers

Identifiers

PMID35581899
PMCPMC9114660
OpenAlexW4280601684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.